Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter
Volume 16 • Issue 1 • January 2006
Health Products and Food Branch
Marketed Health Products Directorate
In this Issue:
Oseltamivir and warfarin: increase in INR
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and uterine perforation
Guidance document for industry
Energy drinks
Case presentation: Rosiglitazone: parotid gland enlargement
Summary of advisories
Scope
This quarterly publication alerts health professionals to potential signals detected through the review of case reports submitted to Health Canada. It is a useful mechanism to disseminate information on suspected adverse reactions to health products occurring in humans before comprehensive risk-benefit evaluations and regulatory decisions are undertaken. The continuous evaluation of health product safety profiles depends on the quality of your reports.
Reporting Adverse Reactions
Contact Health Canada
or a Regional AR Centre
free of charge
Phone: 866 234-2345
Fax: 866 678-6789
Click here for the Adverse Reaction Reporting Form
Caveat: Adverse reactions (ARs) to health products are considered to be suspicions, as a definite causal association often cannot be determined. Spontaneous reports of ARs cannot be used to estimate the incidence of ARs because ARs remain underreported and patient exposure is unknown.
Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and warfarin: suspected increase in INR
Oseltamivir (Tamiflu), an antiviral drug marketed in Canada since 1999, is indicated for the treatment of acute illness due to influenza infection in patients 1 year and older who have been symptomatic for no more than 2 days1. The drug is also indicated for the prevention of influenza illness in people over 13 years of age after close contact with an infected individual.
From Jan. 1, 1999, to Oct. 31, 2005, Health Canada received 19 reports of increased international normalized ratio (INR) suspected of being associated with the use of oseltamivir. These 19 reports involved patients aged 46 to 92 years (median age 84 years), and the indication for use of oseltamivir was either treatment or prophylaxis of influenza. All of the patients were taking warfarin. The reported onset of the adverse reaction ranged from the day treatment was started to 11 days after starting oseltamivir. The increased INR ranged from 3.2 to 10.9. Eleven of the reports were submitted by the same source and described a suspected interaction between oseltamivir and warfarin. Creatinine clearances were provided in these cases; dosage adjustments of oseltamivir were necessary in 3 cases, as recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance rate of 10-30 mL/min.1 Six patients required treatment with vitamin K. At the time of reporting, 12 patients had recovered, 2 patients had not yet recovered, and the outcome was unknown for the remaining 5 patients.
Causality assessment of these cases is difficult because some of the reports presented conflicting or insufficient clinical information, and numerous factors (e.g., diet, medical conditions, fever) are known to influence a patient's response to anticoagulants2. In 3 cases, the warfarin dose was increased after the introduction of oseltamivir; the increases in INR occurred following these dose changes. In 3 other cases, decreases in INR occurred during the course of oseltamivir therapy without a reported change in warfarin dose. In 2 cases, clarithromycin and levofloxacin respectively were reported as co-suspect medications; these drugs are known to interact with warfarin and may cause increases in INR3, 4.
Available data indicate that the potential for drug interactions with oseltamivir is minimal.5 Oseltamivir requires conversion to the active metabolite via esterases, located predominately in the liver1. Drug interactions involving this pathway have not been commonly documented1, 5. The drug does not interact with substrates of various cytochrome P450 isoenzymes5. Oseltamivir is not extensively protein bound and, as a result, is not expected to contribute to drug interactions involving protein-binding displacement. In addition, clinically important drug interactions involving competition for renal tubular secretion are unlikely1.
As with any drug prescribed to patients taking warfarin, more frequent monitoring of INRs may be prudent when oseltamivir is prescribed concurrently with warfarin. Health Canada continues to monitor adverse reactions suspected of being associated with the use of oseltamivir. Health care professionals are encouraged to report any cases of INR fluctuation in patients receiving warfarin and oseltamivir concomitantly.
Sally Pepper, BScPhm; Hima Murty, MDCM, CCFP, Health Canada
References
- Tamiflu (oseltamivir) [product monograph]. Mississauga (ON): Hoffmann-La Roche Limited; 2004.
- Coumadin (warfarin) [product monograph]. Montréal: Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc.; 2002.
- Levaquin (levofloxacin) [product monograph]. Toronto: Janssen-Ortho Inc.; 2005.
- Biaxin (clarithromycin) [product monograph]. St-Laurent (QC): Abbott Laboratories Limited; 2003.
- Dutkowski R, Thakrar B, Froehlich E, et al. Safety and pharmacology of oseltamivir in clinical use. Drug Safety 2003;26(11):787-801.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) and uterine perforation
The levonorgestrel-releasing system Mirena, an intrauterine device (IUD), consists of a polyethylene T-shaped frame with a reservoir containing levonorgestrel.1 Mirena is indicated for use as a contraceptive and, after insertion into the uterus, continuously releases levonorgestrel at a low daily dose for up to 5 years. Mirena's contraceptive action is due mainly to local progestogenic effects on the uterine cavity, including a strong antiproliferative effect on the endometrium and a thickening of the cervical mucus, which prevents the passage of sperm. Ovulation is inhibited in some women. As of Nov. 28, 2005, the product monograph (PM) states that perforation or penetration of the uterus or cervix may occur during insertion but that this is very rare (less than 1 in 10 000). It also states that postpartum insertions should be postponed until 6 weeks after delivery.
From Feb. 22, 2001 (the date of marketing in Canada), to Sept. 26, 2005, Health Canada received 26 reports of uterine perforation suspected of being associated with the use of Mirena. In 8 of the cases, Mirena was inserted between 6 weeks and 6 months post partum. A long-term prospective study of Mirena found a higher uterine perforation rate (0.9 per 1000 insertions) than that described in the PM2. With copper IUDs, the rate of uterine perforation has been 0.6-1.6 per 1000 insertions3, 4. In addition, evidence suggests that women who have IUDs inserted in the first 6 months post partum are at increased risk of uterine perforation5. This elevated risk may be due to the soft consistency of the uterus and the underestimated variability in uterine size during the first 6 months post partum.
Uterine perforation is a rare but serious complication of IUD insertion that occurs or is initiated at the time of insertion.3 Evidence indicates that the rate of uterine perforation is lower in cases where the health care professional inserting the IUD has performed at least 10 previous insertions.4 Currently, there is a shortage of health care providers trained in IUD insertion; access to good knowledge, proper equipment and a mentor to demonstrate and supervise several insertions are prerequisites to providing this service3,6.
Health care professionals inserting the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system are encouraged to take this information into account. Special care should be taken with postpartum insertion, since perforations of the uterus have been reported7.
Andrew Gaffen, BSc, DDS; Gina Coleman, MD, Health Canada.
References
- Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) [product monograph]. Lachine (QC): Berlex Canada Inc.; 2000.
- Zhou L, Harrison-Woolrych M, Coulter DM. Use of the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme to study the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (Mirena). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 2003;12:371-7.
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines: Canadian contraception consensus. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004;26(3):219-96.
- Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: Is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 2003;67(1):53-6.
- Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8(3):150-5.
- Weir E. Preventing pregnancy: a fresh look at the IUD. CMAJ 2003;169(6):585.
- Backman T. Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception. Drug Safety 2004;27(15):1185-204.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
Guidance document for industry: issuance of health product safety communications
Health Canada is pleased to announce the release of the final Guidance Document for Industry - Issuance of Health Professional Communications and Public Communications by Market Authorization Holders (MAH). Health Professional Communications (HPCs) and Public Communications (PCs) are one of the principal means used by industry to communicate new information about safety and therapeutic effectiveness of marketed health products to health care professionals and the public in a timely manner. This guidance document clarifies the roles and responsibilities, the issuance process, the content and the timelines to assist MAHs in developing and disseminating HPCs and their accompanying PCs.
In August 2004, a draft version of this document was released for stakeholder consultation. A total of 183 comments were submitted by stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, pharmaceutical associations and academic centres. The comments were related to technical issues, clarifications and other issues. The final version of the guidance document has been updated in light of these comments. The Marketed Health Products Directorate would like to thank all those who participated in the consultation.
The final version of the guidance document is available on the new Health Canada website, MedEffect.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
Safe use of energy drinks
There are many "energy drink" products currently sold in Canada. They are available in corner stores, gas stations and bars, usually displayed alongside soft drinks, juices and sports drinks.
Excessive intake of "energy drinks" or mixing them with alcohol can have serious health effects. Health Canada received 4 reports of adverse reactions involving "energy drinks". The reported symptoms included electrolyte disturbances, heart irregularities, nausea and vomiting. More information on this topic is available in the It's Your Health article.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
CASE PRESENTATION
Recent Canadian cases are selected based on their seriousness, frequency of occurrence or the fact that the reactions are unexpected. Case presentations are considered suspicions and are presented to stimulate reporting of similar suspected adverse reactions.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
Rosiglitazone (Avandia): suspected association with parotid gland enlargement
Health Canada has received 5 reports of parotid enlargement suspected of being associated with the use of rosiglitazone (Avandia). The cases involved 1 man and 4 women (age range 53 to 72, age not specified in 1 case). Some reports indicated multiple concomitant medications and a complex medical history. Four of the cases involved bilateral parotid enlargement, and 1 had enlargement of the parotid gland to 5 times its normal size. In 1 of the cases, swelling of the submandibular glands occurred as well, and in another case, parotiditis was considered as a differential diagnosis. The reaction onset was reported in 4 of the cases and ranged from 6 to 11 months after the start of the rosiglitazone therapy. The reaction was reported as painless in 3 cases. Upon withdrawal of the rosiglitazone therapy, 1 case reported improvement in 1 week, and in another case, there was gradual resolution of the reaction over 4 months. The outcome was not stated in 2 reports, and in the remaining case, the patient had not yet recovered at the time of reporting.
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
MedEffect e-Notice
MedEffect e-Notice is the new name that replaces Health Canada’s Health_Prod_Info mailing list.
Subscribers will continue to receive notices of new safety advisories on health products along with the
Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter. Thus, the content of the e-notices will remain the same and are now
part of MedEffect, a new Health Canada Web site dedicated to adverse reaction information and reporting.
MedEffect can be visited at:
http://www.healthcanada.gc.ca/medeffect
![Top of Page](/web/20060116195618im_/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/images/dhp-mps/arrow_up.gif)
Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter
Marketed Health Products Directorate
AL 0701B
Ottawa ON K1A 0K9
Tel 613 954-6522
Fax 613 952-7738
Health professionals/consumers report toll free
Tel 866 234-2345
Fax 866 678-6789
Editorial Staff
Ann Sztuke-Fournier, BPharm (Editor-in-Chief)
Ilhemme Djelouah, BScPhm, DIS, AFSA, Medical Biology (University of Paris V)
Gilbert Roy, BPharm
Michel Gagné, BScPht
Sally Pepper, BScPhm
Christianne Scott, BPharm, MBA Acknowledgements
Expert Advisory Committee on Pharmacovigilance,
Regional AR Centres and Health Canada staff.
Suggestions?
Your comments are important to us. Let us know what you think by reaching us at
E-mail: mhpd_dpsc@hc-sc.gc.ca
Copyright
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2006. This publication may be
reproduced without permission provided the source is fully acknowledged.
The use of this publication for advertising purposes is prohibited. Health Canada
does not assume liability for the accuracy or authenticity of the information
submitted in case reports.
ISSN 1499-9447; Cat no H42-4/1-16-1E
USPS periodical postage paid at Champlain, NY, and additional locations.
Aussi disponible en français.
Caveat: Adverse reactions (ARs) to health products are considered to be suspicions, as a definite causal association often cannot be determined. Spontaneous reports of ARs cannot be used to estimate the incidence of ARs because ARs remain underreported and patient exposure is unknown.
|