<
 
 
 
 
×
>
Vous consultez une page Web conservée, recueillie par Bibliothèque et Archives Canada le 2007-04-04 à 19:51:40. Il se peut que les informations sur cette page Web soient obsolètes, et que les liens hypertextes externes, les formulaires web, les boîtes de recherche et les éléments technologiques dynamiques ne fonctionnent pas. Voir toutes les versions de cette page conservée.
Chargement des informations sur les médias

You are viewing a preserved web page, collected by Library and Archives Canada on 2007-04-04 at 19:51:40. The information on this web page may be out of date and external links, forms, search boxes and dynamic technology elements may not function. See all versions of this preserved page.
Loading media information
X
Canada Canadian Heritage / Patrimoine canadien Canada
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home
What's New
About CCI
Who We Are
CCI In Action
Virtual Tour
Services
Learning Opportunities
CCI Library
Publications
The Bookstore
Conservation Information Database
CCI Newsletter
CCI Notes
Technical Bulletins
Resources
Preserving my Heritage Web site
BCIN
Links of Interest
Tools
Preservation Framework Online
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Program
Downloads
Feedback
Tell a Colleague about the site
Symposium 2007


eServices eServices
Tools E-Mail This Page Print Version

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Program

This Web application is designed to assist in assessing and prioritizing the relative importance of various criteria when determining the best option for a defined problem. It is based on a mathematical model that was developed in the early 1970s by Thomas Saaty (Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh: RWS Publication, 1990). Saaty’s analytical hierarchy process includes and measures all tangible and intangible, quantitatively measurable and qualitative criteria, and calibrates each into a numerical scale. The process works by providing a sequence of pairs of criteria (i.e. each criterion is evaluated by comparing it with all the others in a sequence of pairings). For each pairing, participants are asked to rank, on a scale from -9 to +9, how important that criterion is compared with the other one. Continuing with this procedure, the mathematical model eventually gives a relative weight for each criterion, and the summation is normalized to 100%. The model also provides a consistency ratio, which shows how consistent the evaluation of the criteria was during the comparison. A low value (ideally below 0.10) is proof of good consistency.

To begin, enter the number of criteria you wish to prioritize:

Last Updated: 2006-11-30

Important Notices

Home | What’s New | About CCI | Who We Are | CCI In Action | Virtual Tour | Services | Learning Opportunities | CCI Library |
Publications | The Bookstore | Conservation Information Database | CCI Newsletter | CCI Notes | Technical Bulletins | Resources |
Preserving My Heritage Website | BCIN | Links of Interest | Tools | Preservation Framework Online |
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Program | Downloads | Feedback | Tell a Colleague About The Site