Vous consultez une page Web conservée, recueillie par Bibliothèque et Archives Canada le 2007-05-16 à 15:49:42. Il se peut que les informations sur cette page Web soient obsolètes, et que les liens hypertextes externes, les formulaires web, les boîtes de recherche et les éléments technologiques dynamiques ne fonctionnent pas. Voir toutes les versions de cette page conservée.
Chargement des informations sur les médias

You are viewing a preserved web page, collected by Library and Archives Canada on 2007-05-16 at 15:49:42. The information on this web page may be out of date and external links, forms, search boxes and dynamic technology elements may not function. See all versions of this preserved page.
Loading media information
Skip navigation links (access key: Z)Library and Archives Canada - Biblioth?que et Archives Canada Canada
Graphical element Home > Browse Selected Topics > Detecting the Truth Français
Graphical element
Banner: Detecting the Truth: Fakes, Forgeries and TrickeryBanner: Detecting the Truth: Fakes, Forgeries and Trickery

Detecting Deception


Documentary Art

Painting entitled LEFT TO DIE, 1872

Painting entitled Left to Die, 1872

Photograph of painting entitled LEFT TO DIE, circa 1880


Photograph of painting entitled Left to Die, circa 1880

Close-up of horses that were painted over in the painting entitled LEFT TO DIE

Close-up of horses that were painted over in the painting entitled Left to Die

In 1984, Library and Archives Canada (LAC) bought the painting Left to Die by the famous artist Frances Anne Hopkins who used her sketches and watercolours as the basis for her large oil paintings. When we first saw it, we remembered that we had seen a photograph of a very similar painting in one of our albums. When we checked, we realized that the two were almost identical. The only visible difference was the horizon line and a few small figures in the distance. The question was -- were these two different paintings or did someone make changes to the original? Thanks to x-ray technology, we proved that it was Hopkins herself who had made changes to the piece a few years after the photo was taken. This was therefore an altered original!

X-rays are often used to examine paintings because they allow us to see what is hidden underneath a surface without having to damage it. These are the same x-rays hospitals use to see if you have a broken bone under your skin. By using different intensities of x-rays, experts can see different layers of paint and therefore know whether or not a canvas was ever painted over!

Why Hopkins decided to paint over the horizon line we will never know. But what we do know (thanks to x-ray technology) is that she did!

Graphical element

Tricks of the Trade

Examine these paintings closely. Can you see any sections that have been painted over?

Graphical element


Portrait of Am‚lie Panet-Berczy, before restoration, 1800-1810

Portrait of Amélie Panet-Berczy, before restoration, 1800-1810

Portrait of Am‚lie Panet-Berczy, after restoration, 2004

Portrait of Amélie Panet-Berczy, after restoration, 2004

When LAC first acquired this portrait of Louise Amélie Panet-Berczy it was in pretty bad shape. The old varnish had yellowed, there was grime all over, the frame was damaged and it looked like someone had painted over parts of the image. She needed a make over!

But before any conservation work could be done, we had to do our homework. With a scalpel we removed a very small piece of paint and analyzed it under microscopes. We concluded that the face, flowers and lace on the dress were painted at a different time, using a different kind of paint. We looked at some drawings made by Amélie's husband and found one that was a copy of what the painting should have looked like. It proved that in the original version of the portrait, Amélie had no flowers hiding her chest. By reading books about Amélie's father-in-law and the painter of the portrait, William Berczy, we found some information that told us that the changes had been made by a relative of Amélie. It is thought that the face was painted over because the painting had been damaged and that flowers and lace were added to hide what was thought to be too much bare skin!

Once we were sure that the changes were not done by the original painter or by Amélie herself, we decided to restore the piece to its original beauty. We carefully used solvents to remove the old yellow varnish and overpainting. We filled in the places where the paint had completely rubbed off and we added a thin layer of new varnish. And voila, Amélie is once again as beautiful as she ever was!

Previous | Next


conservation: work that includes finding out what objects and documents were made of and what they looked like when they were created so they can be repaired and protected
overpainting: paint, not applied by the artist, that covers the original paint and often is not a necessary change to the image
x-ray technology: short wavelengths that can penetrate solid objects without damaging them

Graphical element