There are a variety of circumstances that lead to the creation of a Treasury Board management or administrative policy
instrument. Similarly, policy instruments may serve one or more general purposes:
- Establish and strengthen a consistent management approach across government;
- Manage significant risks to the operations of all departments; and
- Reflect and put into action public service values such as probity, prudence, equity and transparency.
Collectively, Treasury Board's policy instruments convey an integrated approach to the discipline of public sector
management. Policy instruments provide clear direction to departments on how to orient their activities toward the achievement of
results, attract and retain qualified people, embed a citizen focus in the delivery of programs and services, be good stewards of
public resources and assets, and assist ministers in their accountability to Parliament.
In providing this direction, policy instruments strike a balance that respects the individual authorities and responsibilities
of ministers and deputies, ensures a minimum standard of management excellence is maintained in the government as a whole, and
fosters a working environment that encourages departments to be responsive and innovative.
Treasury Board revises its policy instruments from time to time in consultation with departments. This ongoing effort takes
into consideration the risks and benefits associated with a particular issue and a proposed course of action. One of the goals of
this effort is to maintain a suite of policy instruments that adequately responds to the perceived risks of the time in a
cost-effective manner. Another goal is to continuously improve upon several recurring themes in public sector management: how to
manage in a way that preserves public trust, enhances efficiency and effectiveness, and ensures transparency and accountability.
As stated above, ministers, deputy heads and Treasury Board each have a role in public sector management. However, Treasury
Board's role is unique because, through mandatory policy instruments, it sets the parameters within which all ministers and
deputy heads must exercise the various authorities assigned to their position. Therefore, mandatory policy instruments must
clearly express each player's responsibilities and respect existing lines of accountability.
With this goal in mind, Treasury Board is guided by four principles of effective accountability when developing or
updating policy instruments. First, the roles, responsibilities and performance expectations for all players are clearly
described. Second, performance expectations are balanced with the capacity (skills and resources) of all players to deliver.
Third, credible and timely information is reported to demonstrate policy compliance and good management performance. This
information is also essential to the continuous improvement of public sector management. And finally, there is a process in place
to oversee compliance and management performance and to administer consequences, good or bad, related to compliance and the
performance achieved. In addition to influencing policy development, these four principles are essential to the application of
policy instruments within departments, which is discussed later in this document.
Treasury Board issues a range of policy instruments that are designed to establish mandatory requirements (rules) or voluntary
best practices. There are three types of mandatory instruments (policies, directives and standards) and two voluntary instruments
(guidelines and tools). Table 1 provides further definition. The decision to put in place a mandatory versus a voluntary
instrument depends on the issue being addressed, the management objective, and whether a lack of consistency across government has
the potential to create inequities, inefficiencies or risks that would jeapordize the achievement of the policy objective.
Policies are directed at deputy heads and are designed to achieve certain high-level management objectives. Each policy
describes specific and measurable results that help departments and Treasury Board to assess whether the policy objective has been
achieved. Policies also set out specific requirements or actions that deputy heads must take to achieve the intended results and,
ultimately, the policy objective. The other policy instruments are, for the most part, directedat managers and specialists in
administrative functions (explain the how).
The scope of Treasury Board's policy instruments covers a range of administrative or program-related functions. The headings
under which most policy instruments have been grouped reflect their historical importance, how the scope of administrative
activities has evolved and adapted to address technological innovations, changes in management practice, and increasing
expectations of Canadians. As stated previously, Treasury Board adapts its policies to the changing environment and so the scope
and functional areas may change over time. Most of the policy instruments fall under one of these functional headings:
- financial
- people (human resources)
- information and technology stewardship
- assets and acquired services
- enterprise service delivery
- compensation of employees
- official languages
Each of these policy areas has a higher-level policy framework that outlines the rationale and principles upon which the policy
instruments are based. There are also several policies in other functional areas that do not require a separate policy
framework because this Foundation Framework and the policies themselves provide the underlying principles and rationale. These
policies include the subjects of internal audit, evaluation,
communications and federal
identity, security, learning,
and a management, resources and results
structure.
Instrument
|
Description |
Usual Audience
|
Application
|
Framework
|
Formal statement that provides context and broad guidance with respect to policy themes or clusters. Also provides the
supporting structure within which specific Treasury Board policies and other instruments can be understood in strategic
terms. Explains why Treasury Board sets policy in particular area.
|
Ministers,
Deputy Heads
|
Architectural
|
Policy
|
Formal direction that imposes specific responsibilities on departments. Policies explain whatdeputy
heads and their officials are expected to achieve.
|
Ministers
Deputy Heads
|
Mandatory
|
Directive
|
Formal instruction that obliges departments to take (or avoid) specific action. Directives explain how deputy
heads and their officials must meet the policy objective.
|
Managers
&
Functional Specialists
|
Mandatory
|
Standard
|
A set of operational or technical measures, procedures or practices for government-wide use. Standards provide more
detailed information on how managers and functional specialists are expected to conduct certain aspects
of their duties.
|
Mandatory
|
Guideline
|
A document providing guidance, advice or explanation to managers or functional area specialists.
|
Voluntary
|
Tools
|
Examples include recognized best practices, handbooks, communications products and audit products.
|
Voluntary
|
|