Robert Latimer gets into his car on his farm near Wilkie, Sask.as he prepares to drive to Saskatoon to check in at the Saskatchewan Provincial Corrections Centre, Jan. 18, 2001. (CP PHOTO/Kevin Frayer)

Robert Latimer, a farmer working a spread in Saskatchewan northwest of Saskatoon, killed his 12-year-old daughter Tracy on October 24, 1993. There has never been any doubt about this.

Latimer told police he did it. He said he loved his daughter and could not bear to watch her suffer from a severe form of cerebral palsy. So he placed her in the cab of his Chevy pickup, ran a hose from the exhaust to the cab, climbed into the box of the truck, sat on a tire and watched her die.

Tracy was a 40-pound quadriplegic, a 12-year-old who functioned at the level of a three-month-old. She had been repeatedly operated on and at the time of her murder was due for more surgery, this time to remove a thigh bone. She could not walk, talk or feed herself, though she responded to affection and occasionally smiled. Tracy was in constant, excruciating pain yet, for reasons not entirely clear, could not be treated with a pain-killer stronger than Tylenol.

On November 4, 1993, Latimer was charged with first-degree murder. A year later, he was convicted of second-degree murder.

End of story?

TIMELINE

Oct. 24, 1993
Latimer kills his daughter Tracy by piping carbon monoxide into his truck.

Nov. 16, 1994
Jury convicts Latimer of second degree murder.

July 18, 1995
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decides 2-1 to uphold Latimer conviction.

Oct. 25, 1995
Revelation that prosecutor interfered with jury by questioning them about religion, abortion and mercy killing.

Nov. 27, 1996
Supreme Court of Canada hears Latimer case.

Feb. 6, 1997
Supreme Court orders new trial due to jury interference, but upholds Latimer's confession.

Oct. 27, 1997
Latimer's second trial begins.

Nov. 5, 1997
Jury finds Latimer guilty of second-degree murder and recommends he be eligible for parole after one year.

Dec. 1, 1997
Judge Ted Noble gives Latimer "constitutional exemption", orders sentence of less than two years, with one to be spent in the community.

Nov. 23, 1998
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal sets aside constitutional exemption and upholds mandatory sentence of at least 10-years.

Feb. 1999
Latimer appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada.

May 6, 1999
Supreme Court announced it will hear an appeal of Robert Latimer's sentence for 1993 killing of his seriously disabled daughter.

June 14, 2000
Supreme Court hears appeal.

Jan. 18, 2001
Supreme Court upholds life sentence, with no parole for 10 years.

Dec. 17, 2003
Speaking more than ten years after he ran a hose from the exhaust to the cab of his pickup truck and put his daughter Tracy inside to die, Robert Latimer says he still believes he did the right thing.

Dec. 5, 2007
Latimer's bid for day parole is denied after a National Parole Board hearing at a prison in Victoria. The three board members, who took almost an hour to make a decision, said they were struck by Latimer's lack of insight into the crime he committed, the CBC's Heather Robinson reported.

No.

Over seven years later, January 18th 2001, the Supreme Court of Canada eventually upheld his conviction and life sentence.

The issues arising from the Latimer case are momentous. Should courts abide by the letter or the spirit of the law? Would a decision favourable to Latimer legalize euthanasia, mercy killing? Would it put the disabled in danger? Would it mean the end of mandatory minimum sentences for convicted persons?

The killing of Tracy Latimer has been called an act of "compassionate homicide." Others warn that leniency for Latimer, by means of a constitutional exception, would have shown that the disabled are regarded as second-class citizens.

Following his first conviction, the Latimer case became horrendously complex. The Supreme Court ordered a new trial when it was learned that the RCMP, acting on orders from the Crown, had possibly tainted the case by questioning potential jurors on their views on religion, abortion and mercy killing.

Latimer stood trial again in October, 1997. A month later he was convicted, again, of second-degree murder.

The jury recommended he be eligible for parole after a year, even though the minimum sentence for second-degree murder is 25 years with no chance of parole for 10 years. (Automatic minimum sentences for first- and second-degree murder have been mandatory since 1976, as a trade-off for the abolition of capital punishment.)

New legal ground was broken in December, 1997, when Justice Ted Noble – trying to distinguish between mercy killing and cold-blooded murder – granted Latimer a constitutional exemption from the minimum sentence for second-degree murder. He explained that, for Latimer, the minimum sentence would constitute "cruel and unusual punishment."

Noble carefully detailed the reasons for his decision, anticipating the controversy it would provoke – and the likelihood it would be appealed. He said the law "recognizes that the moral culpability or the moral blameworthiness of murder can vary from one convicted offender to another." He called Tracy Latimer's murder a "rare act of homicide that was committed for caring and altruistic reasons. That is why for want of a better term this is called compassionate homicide."

Noble also described Latimer's relationship with Tracy as "that of a loving and protective parent" who wanted to end his daughter's suffering. Noble said Latimer "is not a threat to society, nor does he require any rehabilitation."

The Crown argued that Tracy was a relatively cheerful child, and her rights were violated by being killed by her father. According to the Crown brief presented at Latimer's second trial:

"Tracy enjoyed outings, one of which was to the circus, where she smiled when the horses went by. She also responded to visits by her family, smiling and looking happy to see them.

"There is no dispute that through her life, Tracy at times suffered considerable pain. As well, the quality of her life was limited by her severe disability. But the pain she suffered was not unremitting, and her life had value and quality."

Nearly a year later, in November, 1998, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal overturned Noble's ruling, imposing the mandatory minimum sentence: 25 years, with no parole before 10 years.

However, his first bid for day parole, in December 2007, was denied after a hearing at a Victoria prison.

Critics of leniency for Latimer worried that a Supreme Court decision soft on Latimer would send a signal to many convicted murderers that they, too, may be victims of "cruel and unusual punishment" and are eligible for constitutional exceptions to reduce their mandatory minimum sentences.

"I think the (Supreme Court) could be opening a Pandora's box," University of Saskatchewan law professor Sanjeev Anand told Kirk Makin, justice reporter for The Globe and Mail. "If the court is very lax … and says you can make constitutional exemptions whenever you want to, it would also encourage Parliament to never create another mandatory minimum sentence."

Unusual as the Latimer case is, there are related cases, such as battered women who have killed their batterers – often their husbands – and received leniency from the courts. Special legislation is being considered for victims who kill their oppressors, based on self-defence. It’s more difficult when the victim, like Tracy Latimer, is so clearly blameless.

An old legal maxim is – "Hard cases make bad law." Whether this applies to the case of Robert Latimer remains to be seen.