Wikipedia talk:Featured articles

FACs needing feedback view •
2006 Subway 500	Review it now
Dopamine	Review it now

Featured article removal candidates
Tamils	Review it now
Georg Forster	Review it now
O-Bahn Busway	Review it now

See also: Wikipedia:Unreviewed featured articles

Good Lists

There is a proposal to set up a new classification level, Good List. Please add your comments there. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC) banter deez nuts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.7.39 (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Main Page redesign underway

A redesign of the Main Page is underway to give it a modern look. However, in order to see the formatting, you must enable the "Show the new version of the Main Page currently under development" gadget under the Testing and development section in your preferences.

In the current redesign draft, the order of presentation of content is being modified, with Today's featured article alone at the top. Your input is welcome. The Transhumanist 13:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Very far from done with Oviri (Gauguin)

Excuse me, did I miss something? I was very far from done with Oviri (Gauguin), yet it somehow got promoted? Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• Best wishes in all things. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

  To you too, man :) For the record Lingzhi was making valuable suggestions, all of which were being taken on board, slowly maybe, and none of which I disagreed with. I think the material issued were deal with, though I was (perhaps selfishly, as his time analysing is helping me a lot) looking forward to another round with him this weekend. Either way: his comments are all moved to the talk, with my commitment that they will be dealt with there (most already had, post promotion, and before I saw this). Ling, I very much valued and appreciated you time and input, and am fine with a FAR, it will amount to the same thing; article improvement. Ceoil (talk) 16:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

All articles can be improved. In my view the article was ready for promotion and there was a consensus to do so. I admit, and apologise for missing, Lingzhi's last comment at the FAC. I thought the last comments were some days before I promoted the article. Often I promote FACs that have remaining unresolved issues and add a comment about continuing the discussion on the article's talk page. I hope that this can be the case here. I am sorry if I have upset anyone. In my defense, there were ten FACs, which I had to go through before promoting on the occasion in question, my attention must have become less than ideal. Apologies. Graham Beards (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

I was a bit gob-smacked, but I see now I did not understand the way Graham runs the process. So move along, nothing to see here. Thanks. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Should WP:TAFI return to the main page?

Please weigh in here: Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement#TAFI on the main page?.--Coin945 (talk) 18:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2015

On "Computing" section there is Scene7 page that should not be there. Scene7 is not featured article. Abstractray (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Actually, it is. It had been cut down to two short paragraphs by an editor who thought that the company did not deserve a long article. I've reverted the changes and invited more discussion of this at the article talk page. Bencherlite^Talk 11:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)