Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 Usernames for administrator attention

Important! Please remember the following:

  1. This page is for usernames that are such blatant and serious problems that they need to be immediately blocked.
  2. Reports are assessed according to the username policy and the UAA instructions. Please read those pages first.
  3. Please discuss less-serious violations with the user so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith.
  4. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
  5. Please do not leave a username warning template on a user's talk page and then immediately report them here. Either discuss it with the user, or report it for admin action, but don't do both at the same time.
  6. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not.
  7. Do not report a username unless it has been used in the last 2-3 weeks. Older accounts are likely abandoned and reports of such users will be summarily declined.


Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 03:42 on 24 November 2015 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


Bot-reported[edit]

  • Manaz123123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Matched: Used 1 instead of i attempting to skip filter: nazi -- DQB (owner / report) 11:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
     Clerk note: Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment- but some real names contain the string "nazi" - especially names from the Middle East - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

User-reported[edit]

Not a blatant violation of the username policy. No evidence that they created this acct to mock you. No evidence that the acct was created to violate policy, ie, no evidence that it's a returning blocked/banned user. No edits since November 15. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. No edits since being warned. Huon (talk) 18:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2-3 weeks. No edits since January. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Not blatant, I think. Good contributions so far. Why not ask them to change it? I'll do so. — Earwig talk 21:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)