Wikipedia:WikiProject Education/Assessment
Education articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |||
FL | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
A | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 5 | 15 | 37 | 1 | 58 | ||
B | 5 | 34 | 56 | 52 | 2 | 26 | 175 |
C | 13 | 43 | 102 | 130 | 3 | 136 | 427 |
Start | 16 | 134 | 335 | 961 | 13 | 784 | 2,243 |
Stub | 21 | 91 | 1,235 | 13 | 492 | 1,852 | |
List | 1 | 3 | 20 | 52 | 7 | 51 | 134 |
Category | 13 | 2,618 | 2,631 | ||||
Disambig | 1 | 1 | 10 | 12 | |||
File | 17 | 17 | |||||
Portal | 397 | 397 | |||||
Project | 10 | 10 | |||||
Template | 1 | 1 | 371 | 373 | |||
NA | 373 | 373 | |||||
Other | 1 | 1 | 21 | 23 | |||
Assessed | 35 | 243 | 626 | 2,486 | 3,834 | 1,511 | 8,735 |
Unassessed | 7 | 17 | 3,106 | 3,130 | |||
Total | 35 | 243 | 633 | 2,503 | 3,834 | 4,617 | 11,865 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = | 23,238Ω = 5.18 |
This is the WikiProject Education assessment summary page. See WP:1.0 and WP:WVWP for more information. For Education articles, see Category:Education or Category:Education lists. For Education stubs, see Category:Education stubs.
Contents
Instructions[edit]
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Education}} banner on its talk page.
- {{WikiProject Education|class=|importance=}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class education articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class education articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class education articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class education articles)
- C (adds articles to Category:C-Class education articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class education articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class education articles)
- NA (for pages, such as redirects or user pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class education articles)
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed education articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance education articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance education articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance education articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance education articles)
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Grading scheme[edit]
Quality scale[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Water fluoridation (as of August 2014) |
||
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
||
GA | The article has attained good article status by passing an official review.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | YouTube (as of August 2014) |
||
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Apple Inc. (as of August 2014) |
||
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Bishop (chess) (as of August 2014) |
||
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Interval vector (as of February 2014) |
||
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Crescent Falls (as of February 2013) |
||
FL | The article has attained featured list status.
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of National Basketball Association season assists leaders (as of April 2014) |
||
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of January 2013) |
Importance scale[edit]
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Adolf Fredrik's Music School Major update --Klättermusen (talk) 17:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Mental health in aviation This article has been extensively revised. Please review my article. Mbenderb1 (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Elec junto Grade Skipping is still lacking an importance rating and I am not familiar enough with this project to give it one. Elec junto (talk) 05:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- User:Ryanx7 A few of us have been editing the page on Public Sphere Pedagogy and would appreciate an independent assessment by a project member.Ryanx7 (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- User:Djohnson82 Requesting assessment of Culturally Relevant Teaching. Request made 13 April 2012.
- Brunswick (Brittonkill) Central School District: This page is only about a month old but is pretty extensive and could use a rating from a member of this wikiproject. Thanks! Wadester16 (talk) 03:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Otto Frederick Hunziker. The article has since been listed as a good article under the good article criteria. I believe that, for WikiProject Education, the article was automatically upgraded from a quality rating of B-Class to GA. I would be interested in any further assessment to A Class or comments regarding possible changes to further progress. Also, could someone reassess the importance rating?--Rpclod (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Stargate School This article had just gotten a major overhaul and could use a rating. I am still working on references and the like but this article is a far cry from what it used to be, and an assessment could really be helpful in working on this article. This article has never gotten an assessment, and I will most likely submit further requests after the initial assessment in an attempt to boost the rating. Binglebongle2000 (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose College: This page was created few weeks back and expanding its content. Need rating and importance for this article from this wikiproject.Shivaji Mitra (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- high-stakes testing: While there is some debate over the exact form the article should take, I think it could do with an assessment. After all, it's a 2 year old article. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Education in Indore: This is list of Educational institutions in Indore(India). Most of the listed institutans have either Internal or External links/References added. Actively being monitored and Updated.
- School for Creative and Performing Arts : This article has been extensively revised and should be rerated. It's importance has also not been assessed yetVaughanchris (talk) 23:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC).
- Education in Ancient Greece: This page was added on to significantly and could use a reevaluation from a wikiproject member. Thank you. Wordwizard1 (talk) 21:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- University of Texas at Dallas: Major update. Stan9999 (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Education in the Netherlands: has not been rated previously --Eddyspeeder (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University: has not been rated by WikiProject_Education SARVPRIYE SONI(Wanna Talk?) 00:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Assessment log (updated by bot)[edit]
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |