Progressive music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Progressive music is a type of music that experiments with alternative routes and expands stylistic boundaries outward.[1][2] The word "progressive" is based on the root concept of "progress", which refers to development and growth by accumulation.[3] In the 1940s, "progressive jazz" described a complex, modernist-inspired variation of big band.[4] By the 1960s, the post-hippie music that was labelled "progressive" (i.e. "progressive pop") would later come to be known as progressive rock.[5] It directly followed the development of rock and roll, pushing the genre into greater complexity while retracing the roots of romantic and classical music.[6]

Jazz[edit]

"Progressive jazz" redirects here. For other uses, see Progressive jazz (disambiguation).
See also: Bebop, Cool jazz, and Third stream
Bandleader Stan Kenton coined the term "progressive jazz" for his approach to big band jazz music that conveyed an association with art music.[7]

Progressive jazz is a form of big band that is more complex[4] or experimental.[7] It originated in the 1940s with arrangers who drew from modernist composers such as Igor Stravinsky and Paul Hindemith.[4] its "progressive" features were replete with dissonance, atonality, and brash effects.[8] Progressive jazz was most popularized by the bandleader Stan Kenton during the 1940s.[4] Critics were initially wary of the idiom.[4] Dizzy Gillespie wrote in his autobiography: "They tried to make Stan Kenton a 'white hope,' called modern jazz and my music 'progressive,' then tried to tell me I played 'progressive' music. I said, 'You're full of shit!' 'Stan Kenton? There ain't nothing in my music that's cold, cold like his."[9]

AllMusic states that, along with Kenton, musicians like Gil Evans, Toshiko Akiyoshi, Cal Massey, Frank Foster, Carla Bley, George Gruntz, David Amram, Sun Ra, and Duke Ellington were major proponents of "progressive big band", a style of big band or swing music that was made for listening, with denser, more modernistic arrangements and more room to improvise.[10]

Pop and rock[edit]

When progressive rock first emerged, it was called progressive pop,[5] with the term "progressive" referring to the wide range of attempts to break with standard pop music formulas through extended instrumentation, personalized lyrics, and individual improvisation.[11] "Progressive rock" evolved from psychedelic (or "acid") rock music,[3] and the term is almost synonymous with "art rock".[12] Proto-prog is the advanced music that slightly predates the progressive rock era of the late 1960s.[13][nb 1]

Up until the mid 1960s, individual idiolects always operated within particular styles. What was so revolutionary about this post-hippie music that came to be called 'progressive' ... was that musicians acquired the facility to move between styles—the umbilical link between idiolect and style had been broken.

—Allan Moore[5]

Sociologist Paul Willis believes: "We must never be in doubt that 'progressive' music followed rock 'n' roll, and that it could not have been any other way. We can see rock 'n' roll as a deconstruction and 'progressive' music as a reconstruction."[1] The music developed immediately after a brief period during the 1960s when creative authenticity among musical artists and consumer marketing coincided with each other.[1] In 1966, the degree of social and artistic dialogue among rock musicians dramatically accelerated for bands like the Beach Boys, the Beatles, and the Byrds.[3] By 1970, a journalist at Melody Maker highlighted progressive pop as the "most fascinating and recent development" in popular music, writing that the music is "meant for a wide audience but which is intended to have more permanent value than the six weeks in the charts and the 'forget it' music of older pop forms."[15] Author Will Romano states that "rock itself can be interpreted as a progressive idea ... Ironically, and quite paradoxically, 'progressive rock', the classic era of the late 1960s through the mid- and late 1970s, introduces not only the explosive and exploratory sounds of technology ... but traditional music forms (classical and European folk) and (often) a pastiche compositional style and artificial constructs (concept albums) which suggests postmodernism."[16]

Macan writes that King Crimson's album "displays every element of the mature progressive rock genre ... [and] exerted a powerful extramusical influence on later progressive rock bands".[17]

Problems playing this file? See media help.

Cleveland's Troy Smith believes that the Beach Boys' 1966 album Pet Sounds "established the group as forefathers of progressive pop".[18] Both Pet Sounds and the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967), with their lyrical unity, extended structure, complexity, eclecticism, experimentalism, and influences derived from classical music forms, are largely viewed as beginnings in the progressive rock genre.[19][nb 2] Critics assumed King Crimson's album In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) to be the logical extension and development of late 1960s proto-progressive rock exemplified by the Moody Blues, Procol Harum, Pink Floyd, and the Beatles.[21] According to Edward Macan, the album may be the most influential to progressive rock for crystallizing the music of earlier "proto-progressive bands ... into a distinctive, immediately recognizable style".[17] He distinguishes 1970s "classic" prog from late 1960s proto-prog by the conscious rejection of psychedelic rock elements, which proto-progressive bands continued to embrace.[22]

In the opinion of King Crimson's Robert Fripp, "progressive" music was an attitude, not a style. He believed that genuinely "progressive" music pushes stylistic and conceptual boundaries outwards through the appropriation of procedures from classical music or jazz, and that once "progressive rock" ceased to cover new ground – becoming a set of conventions to be repeated and imitated – the genre's premise had ceased to be "progressive".[2] "Post-progressive" is a term invented to distinguish a type of rock music from the persistent "progressive rock" style associated with the 1970s.[23]

Electronic[edit]

AllMusic defines "progressive electronic" as a subgenre of new age music which "thrives in more unfamiliar territory. The styles that emerge are often dictated by the technology itself. Rather than sampling or synthesizing acoustic sounds to electronically replicate them, these composers tend to mutate the original timbres, sometimes to an unrecognizable state. True artists in the genre also create their own sounds."[24] Writer Simon Reynolds posits that "the truly progressive edge in electronic music involves doing things that can't be physically achieved by human beings manipulating instruments in real-time."[25]

Giorgio Moroder performing in 2015

In disco music, and later house music, a desire to separate more exploratory styles from standard approaches[not in citation given] saw DJs and producers adopting the word "progressive" to make a distinction. According to the DJ and producer Carl Craig, the term "progressive" was used in Detroit in the early 1980s in reference to Italo disco. The music was dubbed "progressive" because it drew upon the influence of Giorgio Moroder's Euro disco rather than the disco inspired by the symphonic sound of Philadelphia soul.[26]

By 1993, progressive house and trance music had emerged in dance clubs.[27] "Progressive house" was an English style of house distinguished by long tracks, big riffs, mild dub inflections, and multitiered percussion. According to Reynolds, the "'progressive' seemed to signify not just its anti-cheese, nongirly credentials, but its severing of house's roots from gay black disco."[28] Reynolds also identifies links between progressive rock and other electronic music genres, and that "many post-rave genres bear an uncanny resemblance to progressive rock: conceptualism, auteur-geniuses, producers making music to impress other producers, [and] showboating virtuosity reborn as the 'science' of programming finesse."[29]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Author Doyle Greene believes that the "proto-prog" label can stretch to "the later Beatles and Frank Zappa", Pink Floyd, Soft Machine, and United States of America.[14]
  2. ^ Describing Pet Sounds as "unprecedented" for the way its "notes moved and vibrated across the record", music critic Joel Freimark says that "many may struggle to see the direct link between the bright, bouncy tones of Pet Sounds and bands like the Beatles, Jimi Hendrix and countless prog-rock bands."[20]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Willis 2014, p. 219.
  2. ^ a b Macan 1997, p. 206.
  3. ^ a b c Holm-Hudson 2013, p. 85.
  4. ^ a b c d e Ake, Garrett & Goldmark 2012, p. 131.
  5. ^ a b c Moore 2004, p. 22.
  6. ^ Willis 2014, pp. 204, 219.
  7. ^ a b "Progressive Jazz". AllMusic. 
  8. ^ Butler 2002, pp. 103–105.
  9. ^ Gillespie 2009, p. 337.
  10. ^ "Progressive Big Band". AllMusic. 
  11. ^ Haworth & Smith 1975, p. 126.
  12. ^ "Prog-Rock". AllMusic. 
  13. ^ Sositko, Jason (May 8, 2015). "What Are the Best Proto-Prog Rock Albums of All-Time?". Spacial Anomaly. 
  14. ^ Greene 2016, p. 182.
  15. ^ Jacobshagen, Leniger & Henn 2007, p. 141.
  16. ^ Romano 2010, p. 24.
  17. ^ a b Macan 1997, p. 23.
  18. ^ Smith, Troy L. (May 24, 2016). "50 greatest album-opening songs". cleveland.com. 
  19. ^ Macan 1997, p. 15,20.
  20. ^ Freimark, Joel (January 26, 2016). "Brian Wilson tours to celebrate 50th anniversary of ‘Pet Sounds’". Death and Taxes Mag. 
  21. ^ Macan 2005, p. 75.
  22. ^ Macan 2005, p. xxiii.
  23. ^ Hegarty & Halliwell 2011, p. 224.
  24. ^ "Progressive Electronic". AllMusic. 
  25. ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 50.
  26. ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 16.
  27. ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 184.
  28. ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 376.
  29. ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 386.

Bibliography[edit]

Further reading[edit]