Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


Contents

MonteCristo[edit]

requesting userfication of article, deleting admin has declined to restore page -Prisencolin (talk) 23:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Why have they declined to restore the page? Perhaps deletion review is required. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Can't remember being contacted; link to my talk?  Sandstein  05:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • In the AfD I asked that the page be userfied, but you declined to do so after closing the discussion--Prisencolin (talk) 03:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

PGS Gaming[edit]

it's an A7, but the deleting admin seems to be inactive -Prisencolin (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done This article was from 2008, please create a new one with reliable sources. Nakon 02:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Could I get the old one restored to my userspace? I'd like to see what I can work with before starting from scratch.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: just a note that I've peeked at the deleted version and it's an unreferenced stub just a few sentences long. Airplaneman 19:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

فريد شهاب[edit]

I am a new member on Wikipedia and I am still in the learning process on how to create pages. I request first of all to get a copy of my deleted page. Secondly, I created a page that is in Arabic language but I created it in en.wikipedia by mistake. So I would like to retain a copy of the article if you don't mind. To explain, the article was deleted by speedy deletion, and one of the admins claimed that it was copied from a website, but the truth is that only the section of the "leaked official governmental documents" (which should not be paraphrased under any circumstance and should be copied at they are without any edits) were copied, which I believe makes sense. In the article that I created, I already explained that explicitly. The speedy deletion didnt give me a chance to at least edit the page and maybe delete the whole section of the "leaked official governmental documents". In any case, it would be great if I got a copy of the article, and also if it can be undeleted so I can edit it and remove the controversial section. -Alikhandro.farhat (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment to whomever reviews this request: could you please check the percentage of copyvio (copyvios report)? If I recall correctly, the page was 99% identical to the provided url, but I am not entirely sure. Also, this request follows up on this discussion, if you are interested. - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
@Alikhandro.farhat: since it contains copyright material I will not restore it, but I have emailed you a copy of the text. It does not matter whether the material is leaked Government documents, if it is copyright Wikipedia cannot host it. Read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. Yes, Wikileaks publishes leaked documents in full, but Wikileaks does not operate within the law, and Wikipedia does. (Note that Wikileaks has no connection with the Wikimedia Foundation). I advise you to take advice on the Arabic Wikipedia before writing an article there about this material.
If you are learning to be a Wikipedia contributor, you should also read WP:Assume good faith (ar:ويكيبيديا:افترض_حسن_النية) and WP:No personal attacks (ar:ويكيبيديا:لا_للهجوم_الشخصي). Your message to HyperGaruda was absolutely unacceptable, and any repetition will lead to your being blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Cambridge Model United Nations[edit]

New information has appeared -Lpanjwani44 (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment: Admins, note that the page was G7'd at about the same time concerns about spam and copyright violations were brought up. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done This looks to have been entirely taken from this press release. I restored it temporarily, but only to re-speedy it under the correct criteria so that it's not accidentally restored in the future. Wikipedia cannot host content taken from other places and even if the content was given up as fair use it would still be considered too promotional to remain on Wikipedia. Lpanjwani44, feel free to write a new submission, but it must be neutral and in your own words. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

KioWare[edit]

I, Lboniello, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lboniello (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

@Lboniello: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:KioWare. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Enactus[edit]

Requesting userfication. Page was justifiably deleted under G11, but prior to recent PR and likely COI editing, was tenable as wp page. I'd like access to the history so I can work to bring the article back up to snuff. -Regards, James (talk/contribs) 18:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

  • As long as it's ok with DGG, I'm ok with this. I will warn you - the speedy nominator also questioned the page's notability so that would be something that you'd have to take into consideration while improving the article as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, and good luck with it, but I would be a little surprised if anyone could make this into an acceptable article. DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done @James Allison: This has been moved to User:James Allison/Enactus. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of VPN providers[edit]

I, Suncatcher 13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Suncatcher (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Ātmaprajñānanda Saraswati[edit]

Her creation,books and effort to make live Ancient sastra is commendable. -Stallion444 11:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

@Stallion444: X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ātmaprajñānanda Saraswati, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Commendable effort is not enough, what is needed is references that show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Herminius (Company)[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Adenley (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC) I need to flesh out this page, but did not have time to do so before it was deleted.

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (DGG (talk · contribs)) instead. You may be better served taking this to draft to flesh it out, as mainspace pages will be deleted if they aren't up to par, and AfC is specifically for articles that need some TLC before they're ready for mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Adenley., please use draft, and remember that you need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements , Many trade sources are considered here as essentially press releases. DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Charlie Conte[edit]

Charlie Conte is a contract of Viva Artist and appear on GMA's TV show and other shows in ABS CBN. This is the reason why you should not delete this new created page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazaro (talkcontribs) 22:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
@Kazaro: deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Conte, and that is where you should comment. Read WP:ENTERTAINER to understand Wikipedia's notability standard for entertainers, and WP:DISCUSSAFD. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Shepparton / Youth Club United Cricket Club[edit]

Gibbounleashed (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Gibbounleashed: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Zindagi Kitni Haseen Hai[edit]

This is very notable article. It is about an upcoming film and you can find everything about it on Google News. Confirm it's notability HERE and undelete it. -175.110.48.234 (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it was created by a blocked or banned user. See this for more details. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Structural-Safety[edit]

I, Gordon Masterton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gordon Masterton (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peter_Livingston_Myer[edit]

I would like to get this page published eventually and need more time, thank you. -Russannrocks (talk) 15:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Edvan do Nascimento[edit]

Played 8 matches in Liga I, a proffesional football league, as of transfermarkt -Ionutzmovie (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Avril Lavigne Bandaids[edit]

I, Paladium, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Because i want to edit the page to fit the wikipedia criteria. -Paladium (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:AnimatedFaith[edit]

I, 75.142.87.74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 75.142.87.74 (talk) 17:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Daojia[edit]

I, FourLights, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FourLights (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done This should not have been deleted via g13. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Universal trinity[edit]

The article was suddenly speedy deleted during its discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Universal trinity. -MathLine (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Since your wrote it and it was speedy deleted you should ask the deleting admin @RHaworth: to restore to your user space. The content looks like it was made up, and that was why it was deleted as a hoax. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Aung Soe Min[edit]

I wish to add more citation, as more articles have been written about Aung Soe Min in the intervening six months, and a book about his work is near publication -Inkish (talk) 21:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

EUROAVIA[edit]

I would like the create a brand new proper article considering the title "Save page" button below -Yagmurgenco (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Yagmurgenco: that article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Association of Aerospace Students, and the title has been protected after it was re-created. It was very long, and read like the organization telling the world all about itself in great detail. Therefore, I will not restore it: you would do best to start from a clean sheet and use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft. When it is ready, ask the protecting administrator, RHaworth (talk), whether he will agree that the article should be published. If not, you can apply at WP:Deletion review. Read WP:Your first article for advice; more advice on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Firebolt Racing[edit]

I, Vascodergama, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vascodergama (talk) 10:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Vascodergama: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Golf Society Code of Practice and Constitution[edit]

I, Peter Heron, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peter Heron (talk) 10:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Peter Heron: Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. I restored this last November after this request, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Jinadasa Niyathapala[edit]

112.134.82.8 (talk) 14:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!"
This is nearly ready: what it needs is references to reliable sources to verify what it says. The only references are to Wikipedia, which is not considered reliable. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Paula E. Kirman[edit]

I, Wearywordsmith, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wearywordsmith (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Wearywordsmith: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Elizabeth Stampede Rodeo[edit]

I, Leo1701, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I AM A VOLUNTEER FOR THE ORGANIZATION THAT HAS PUT ON THIS RODEO FOR MORE THAN 25 YEARS AS A PRCA (PROFESSIONAL) RODEO AND ANOTHER 20 OR SO YEARS BEFORE THAT AS AN AMAEUR RODEO. AS A VOLUNTEER, I HAVE NOT HAD TIME TO EDIT THE ARTICLE TO MEET THE CITATION STANDARDS. PLEASE REINSTATE IT AND I WILL FIND TIME TO WORK ON IT AND RESUBMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. and then click the "Save page" button below -Leo1701 (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Mini Militia[edit]

It contained the information about the game which was unwritten and the article was in improvement but it was deleted. -Laxnesh LOKEN (talk) 16:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini Militia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Mustapha Kamel[edit]

Mustapha Kamel is a singer songwriter and ceo founder of a record label named Almost There Records -Almosttheremusic (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. I would also suggest reading our Terms of use and username policy. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment: the page is now deleted, and as I deleted it I will leave it to another admin to reply to the request for undeletion: but I will explain that Wikipedia is quite choosy about article subjects, requiring references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," and that the notability standard for musical performers is explained at WP:MUSICBIO. I don't think Kamel's career has (yet) reached that level - releasing some singles on iTunes is not enough. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:English Braille Grade 3[edit]

I, Sitaron, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sitaron (talk) 16:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Sitaron: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!"
Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references. I am not sure this is going to be suitable for an encyclopedia article: check out WP:NOTMANUAL. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Got No Breeding[edit]

Timbob58 (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Timbob58: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

HeliOffshore[edit]

AnnandaleComms (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@AnnandaleComms: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hesham Usama Khan[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hunt master (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hunt master: X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Michael E. Nelson[edit]

I, AlexMcCallum, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AlexMcCallum (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Gogoing[edit]

retrieving WP:A5 deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Prisencolin, I'll move it to your userspace. Since it was made by a sockpuppet you might want to do a cut/paste of the content after you're done - people can be really touchy about articles created by a sock, so I'm worried that if you moved it back with the original author in the history, it might be retagged. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I actually managed to restore it without the original editor's edit. It looks like they only made the initial edit and you made almost all of the subsequent edits, so it made it a bit easy to do. Since it looks like it was only deleted as A5 and I managed to get the sock's name out of the article history, I'll just leave it in the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Prisencolin, I got dinged pretty hard on restoring another G5 without checking with the deleting admin, so I've re-deleted it and made this a X mark.svg Not done. You need to contact RHaworth over this. Sorry about that. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patricia Matthews[edit]

I, Calgarytech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Calgarytech (talk) 01:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I have time to work on this page again and have dozens of hours into it already. Thanks for your help and have a great day. -Calgarytech (talk) 01:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm changing this to the correct draft name. It looks like it was moved several times, not by Calgarytech. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

User:PIJUS/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) PIJUS 05:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done This contained material that was taken directly from this website. Copyright is automatically assumed unless the content is expressly marked as fair use or a ticket is submitted through WP:OTRS giving Wikipedia permission to use the material, so we cannot restore this. That said, I see no reason why I can't email you a copy of this so you can fix the copyright issues and work on a new copy. The only catch is that you cannot repost any content that has previously been published off of Wikipedia. I'll post a copyright notice on your talk page so you can see the guidelines over this, since this can be a pretty common mistake. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Madhurapuri Builders[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -A U Reshma Krishnan (talk) 12:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done, nothing to do. @A U Reshma Krishnan: There is no deleted article having a title beginning with "Madhurapuri" in draft, AFC, or main article spaces. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Chicago Meat Authority[edit]

I, Bartlomiejw, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bartlomiejw (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Point Source Audio[edit]

I, ChannaPSA, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChannaPSA (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Otherwind Games[edit]

I, Almartor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Almartor (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Randy Shumway[edit]

I, Ampersandian, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ampersandian (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Padajijo.png[edit]

The permission for use of this work has been archived in the wikimedia OTRS system available as ticket number 2014100910013282, so I believe this file is eligible for restore as OTRS ticket was approved only after necessary research on the photo. -Rajeshbieee (talk) 19:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Don Oriolo[edit]

I, TheFluffiestHead, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheFluffiestHead (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I ended up getting quite busy over the past few months, but now have some time to fix the issues with this draft. Please undelete so I can continue to edit. Thanks! -TheFluffiestHead (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alfred Demirjian[edit]

I, 50.157.206.87, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.157.206.87 (talk) 20:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I moved it to Draft:Alfred Demirjian. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Alfred Demirjian[edit]

Error corrections to prove relevancy of the article now available -50.157.206.87 (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:MGM Cartoon 60s.jpg[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marole3 (talk) 01:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC) I think it should be kept.

Lifelike[edit]

Lifelike fulfills the following notability criteria:

  • Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart, which is Discopolis by Lifelike & Kris Menace, ranked 89 in UK Singles chart as of 12/2006 as it can be seen here and here. It reached the 10th place in Finland Singles Top 20. It also reached #18, Belgium Dance Chart #1, Germany/France Dance Chart #5. Also, The soul of my love reached 5th place in the French Dance Chart.[1]
  • Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.DJ Mag, Musicradar, Future Music Magazine, etc.
  • Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network at BBC Radio 1’s Pete Tong and Annie Mac [2][3].
  • He also toured all over the world, only to mention some 2009 gigs: St Petersburg on nov 27, Singapore dec 31 and Rome jan 5, Aug 2009 Stockholm [4].

If the article is recovered, I will edit it so that it will fulfill the criteria, just like I did with the previous request for undeletion at Edvan do Nascimento.-Ionutzmovie (ro:wp admin) (talk) 02:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

I read the policies and I know that I have to contact the admin who closed the discussion. But that admin, Tanthalas39, is retired. What should I do now? Ask for a Deletion review?Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Oku Tech[edit]

I believe the page follows all Wikipedia guidelines and does not contain any element with in intention of advertisement. -Jugmendra (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Jugmendra, this is currently up for deletion as a proposed deletion. In this type of situation you can contest the deletion by removing the PROD template, although I'd recommend that you add more sourcing to the article. (For speedy deletions or AfD, you wouldn't be able to remove the template, but for PRODs you can. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Comaval/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) User:Comaval/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comaval (talkcontribs) 08:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It looks like portions of this were taken directly from this website. All content will need to be re-written in your own words. Some of it looks to be slightly closely paraphrased from things like this, but the lead contained two sentences taken directly from the first website. However that said, I will e-mail you a copy of the article so you can edit things. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:HG Christie draft[edit]

I, Paola.alvino, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paola.alvino (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:EzStorage[edit]

I, 2607:FCC8:6201:5C00:99A6:2A1C:CF62:6060, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2607:FCC8:6201:5C00:99A6:2A1C:CF62:6060 (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joan Susannah Sadler (nee Wilkinson)[edit]

I, Tswilk3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tswilk3 (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC) ,

Draft:Royal Aero Club Records Racing and Rally Association[edit]

I, Petechilcott, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petechilcott (talk) 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


The website quoted as having the copyright has actually taken information from our organisations's handbook. I don't think we can infringe our own copyright in this insatnce -Petechilcott (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Symbol declined.svg Declined. @Petechilcott: We cannot restore copyrighted material on the basis of the word of some Wikipedia account. You don't control the servers, you don't host or distribute the content of a Wikipedia article. The Wikimedia Foundation does that. And the Wikimedia Foundation doesn't have permission to distribute that content. A random Wikipedia account claiming to represent the copyright holder cannot grant that permission. Permission must be sent to the Wikimedia foundation via a communication channel that is verifiably traceable to the copyright holder, such as an email from your organization's domain, or a statement on your organization's web site that the handbook is either public domain or released to the public under an acceptable free license such as Creative Commons. See WP:CONSENT for more information. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

OK - I'm progressing! To which address should I send my email. I will also look at the Creative Commons path

Petechilcott (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Unwoman[edit]

This article was previously recovered from deletion under PROD and it is my understanding that an article isn't supposed to be PRODed twice, which this one was. Please restore it again and, hopefully someone won't try PRODing it a third time. -Blackfyr (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unwoman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
  • Blackfyr, the second deletion was actually at AfD and not PROD, which is a completely different beast. I remember this AfD and it wasn't really easy to find sourcing overall, since a lot of it would be considered WP:TRIVIAL coverage. You can talk to RoySmith about getting the page restored or userfied, as he seemed open to the idea. The main thing you'd need to do is show where she's received more coverage. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • This could be helpful, since it helps back up that she's a pioneer in the steampunk genre per the documentary. Of course we'd have to show that the documentary is notable, which might take time since it looks like it hasn't actually released yet. Still, it's a start. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I've restored this to Draft:Unwoman. You can continue to work on the article there. Please keep in mind that this does not mean it will automatically move back to mainspace; you will need to add appropriate sources to meet our notability rules, as per the AfD. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Brenda Kerr[edit]

I, Rugbyleagueorg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyleagueorg (talk) 03:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Kind of mildly concerned that the username looks like it represents an organization... Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
    @Rugbylelagueorg: Are you aware that organizations are not permitted to have Wikipedia accounts? Please go to WP:CHU/Simple and request a change of username that represents only you as an individual. I'm reluctant to proceed with your request until that is done. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Rugby, an example of what I found concerning would be this edit, which comes across as a little promotional, especially since it looks like it was taken from the club itself. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Padyukov Sergey[edit]

I, Geneticist 007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geneticist 007 (talk) 06:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Charter of Honour[edit]

I, Timoluege, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Timoluege (talk) 08:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Designite[edit]

I, Ocpjp7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ocpjp7 (talk) 08:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Intent to edit and resubmit -Ocpjp7 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:SmartDeploy Enterprise[edit]

I, Ksmith2003, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ksmith2003 (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Continue to work on page for publication -Ksmith2003 (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Patricia Matthews (politician)[edit]

I, Calgarytech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Calgarytech (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Patricia Matthews (politician) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:InvisibleMouse1.jpg[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marole3 (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • @Marole3: This is a fair use image screenshot from The Invisible Mouse, a 1947 Tom and Jerry cartoon. It was deleted more than 6 years ago. What do you want to do with it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

I think it's part of the article and should be restored. Also true for File:InvisibleMouse3.jpg.Marole3 (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Marole3.

  • Yes check.svg Done Both restored and orphan timer extended. Please use, else they will delete again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gradient-only optimisation[edit]

I, Saiteki-ka, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saiteki-ka (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)