Will Budget 2017 Help Veterans?

Ottawa, ON - February 20, 2017

This text was authored by Guy Parent, Veterans Ombudsman, and originally published in The Hill Times on Monday, February 20, 2017.

A year ago in The Hill Times, I challenged the status quo to “go beyond today’s ideas and shape tomorrow by clearly defining Veterans’ outcomes – the end results that we want to achieve – and figure out the steps needed to attain optimal results for Veterans and their families.”  

A year later, with Budget 2017 on the horizon, have we made progress and begun to clearly define the results that we want to achieve for Veterans and their families?   

I believe that Budget 2016 improvements are making a positive difference in the lives of Veterans and their families. But, I also believe that there is still much to do.

To add perspective to this viewpoint, I recently conducted a review of the Government’s response to the recommendations made by my Office since its inception.

Out of the 57 recommendations that were developed in collaboration with Veterans’ advocates and organizations, 37 have been fully or partially implemented and 20 are waiting to be addressed. Six of the items in the Minister of Veterans Affairs’ Mandate Letter are based on my recommendations, and three of these were addressed in Budget 2016 – increasing the Earnings Loss Benefit to 90 percent and the Disability Award to $360,000, as well as changes to the Last Post Fund.

There are still outstanding recommendations that would make a significant impact on the lives of Veterans and their families should they be implemented:

  • Retroactive reimbursement of treatment benefits for Veterans, covered under the New Veterans Charter, while they are waiting for a decision from Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC);
  • Adequate compensation for primary caregivers of seriously disabled Veterans;
  • The overlap between SISIP and VAC income support and rehabilitation programs creates unnecessary confusion and needs to be addressed; and
  • The implementation of a Veterans ID card. (I hear about this from Veterans at my outreach events and town halls. After five years, VAC is only now exploring options.)

I would also like to see action on:

  • Closing the seam for our serving members as they transition from military to civilian life;
  • Reducing the complexity of VAC programs and services;
  • Improving VAC’s service delivery approach; and
  • Increasing the financial well-being of Veterans so that they have enough money to meet their needs if they can’t work because of their service, and if they can work, to adequately compensate for their pain and suffering. 

So, when it comes to Budget 2017, I hope it will address several of the outstanding recommendations that came from the collective work effort of the Veterans’ community over the past several years.

My fellow Veterans and I know that there will be many competing priorities for funds in the upcoming Budget. Veterans have earned Canadians’ respect and gratitude for their service – including putting their lives on the line for Canada – and deserve the best care and support that we can give. We will be watching to see if Budget 2017 ensures better results for Veterans and their families.

Guy Parent
Veterans Ombudsman

Blog Comments

Please add your comment below. Remember if your submission is a complaint about your circumstances please use the Submit a Complaint section.

Important Notice

View Important Notice Details

By participating, you are taking personal responsibility for your comments, your username and any information provided. To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, comments containing personal information will not be published. "Personal information" means information about an identifiable individual that is recorded in any form. It may include, but is not limited to: name, address, email address, race, ethnic origin, medical and employment history, and identifying numbers. Note as well that the views or opinions expressed about another individual are considered personal information about and belonging to that individual.

Note: All fields marked with a red asterisk (*) must be filled out.

(will not be published)

Privacy Notice

View Privacy Notice Details

Provision of the information requested on this form is voluntary. It is collected under the authority of the Veterans Ombudsman Order in Council P.C. 2007-530. The information is collected for the purpose of providing an opportunity for the public to provide input on issues identified in the Veterans Ombudsman’s blog. Personal information that you provide is protected under the provisions of the Privacy Act.

The Act provides you with the right to access and request correction of your personal information.

Your personal information will be stored in Personal Information Bank number VAC PPU 210.

If you have any questions, contact our Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator.

Comments

Anonymous said:

This Lump sum Option, still for the Birds.. Per say I today get a 10% award, so $36K.. and I'm 50 year's old, so I go Hmm, over 5 years.. so they take the $36K, divide it by 60 and I get my monthly pension $600 a month.. Now, if I get a LSA, 10% so again $60K, and go okay take it as a lifetime pension.. so they go okay Oh wait, how many months are we gonna take this over, Hmm, he's 50 year's old, it's a lifetime pension, so how on earth can they figure out a lump sum lifetime pension award amount, when they can't or don't know how long your gonna live for.?????????? make payment based of me hitting 70, 75, well I might live longer, I could live shorter.. Basing it off something else like LSA won't work.. thats why the Pension Act worked, cause it was the same across the board... Also note, since I forgot in other Post, Tell the Minister of Veterans Affairs, with the Education Benefit $40K / $80K to STOP CREATING MORE TIERS, your only entitled to this cause your less then 12 year's, Oh you get more cause More then 12 year's, this has created YET another tier.. Remember, 1 Veteran 1 Standard, Say NO to more Tier Stuff One Veteran One standard One rate for ALL.

March 23, 2017 7:07 AM

BinRat said:

So this new Education part as we are discussing it elsewhere totally screwed up, cause someone who joins, says 20 year old, goes Infantry, goes to Afghanistan, gets injured, medically released 3B after say 5 year's of service, Now only gets the $40K to get re-educated vice the $80K cause he didn't do 12 year's. Cause now he is 25 Year's old, medically screwed up, Who could benefit per say from a 3-4 year retraining, but gets screwed cause, well ya get $40K or $10K a year for University studies, and he's only 25 year's old. Why not everyone, if you completed your BE 1st 3 years of service, Medically released you should get the FULL $80K Amount, and not restrict it to Well you need 12 years service with a CD Medal to get the full $80K

March 23, 2017 6:55 AM

Patrick Gem said:

They are completely underwater with claims to process ! Takes too much time to train new staff and also still no mention on real long term disability financial security! It is time too bring back the Pension Act and streamline together with NVC and not penalize the members who had no choice but the lump sum which is not financial security for the injured Veteran...Homeless Veterans is unacceptable!!!

March 6, 2017 9:17 PM

Anonymous said:

Does the increase to the lump sum benefit also increase the monthly pension amount? This number when originally created was based on the pension amount. They have been indexed together since 2006, It would be ludicrous for the numbers to be disconnected...one raised and then grow in conjunction again. How is a veteran at a 100% pension amount to survive at a rate that is not being adjusted like the lump sum when the cost of living and disability settlements has outpaced the COLA formula used by the Government of Canada. I feel on 1 April 2017 I will become approx 20% poorer than my NVC comrades who receive lump sums. $48000 is not enough to even support a family anymore when you are under 40 and living in a larger centre close to the medical care that you require.

March 6, 2017 8:26 PM

Mark Alford said:

I'd like to know what the VA Minister is planning to do about the back log of claims. I'm not hearing anything to inspire confidence that he is planning on stream lining the wait times for the process of claims. Right now they are processing claims from April or 2016 and it's almost March 2017. This is TOTALLY unacceptable.

February 24, 2017 3:41 PM