Global warming

Global mean surface temperature from 1880 to 2018, relative to the 1951–1980 mean. The black line is the global annual mean, and the red line is the five-year local regression line. The blue bars show a 95% confidence interval.

Average global temperatures from 2014 to 2018 compared to a baseline average from 1951 to 1980, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

This page is about the current warming of the Earth's climate system. "Climate change" can also refer to climate trends at any point in Earth's history. For other uses see Global warming (disambiguation).

Global warming is long-term rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system, an aspect of current climate change shown by temperature measurements and by multiple effects of the warming. The term commonly refers to the mainly human-caused increase in global surface temperatures and its projected continuation. In this context, the terms global warming and climate change are often used interchangeably, but climate change includes both global warming and its effects, such as changes in precipitation and impacts that differ by region. There were prehistoric periods of global warming, but observed changes since the mid-20th century have been much greater than those seen in previous records covering decades to thousands of years.

In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report concluded, "It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century." The largest human influence has been the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Climate model projections summarized in the report indicated that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 0.3 to 1.7 °C (0.5 to 3.1 °F) in a moderate scenario, or as much as 2.6 to 4.8 °C (4.7 to 8.6 °F) in an extreme scenario, depending on the rate of future greenhouse gas emissions and on climate feedback effects. These findings have been recognized by the national science academies of the major industrialized nations and are not disputed by any scientific body of national or international standing.

The effects of global warming include rising sea levels, regional changes in precipitation, more frequent extreme weather events such as heat waves, and expansion of deserts. Surface temperature increases are greatest in the Arctic, which has contributed to the retreat of glaciers, permafrost, and sea ice. Overall, higher temperatures bring more rain and snowfall, but for some regions droughts and wildfires increase instead. Climate change threatens to diminish crop yields, harming food security, and rising sea levels may flood coastal infrastructure and force the abandonment of many coastal cities. Environmental impacts include the extinction or relocation of many species as their ecosystems change, most immediately the environments of coral reefs, mountains, and the Arctic. Because the climate system has a large "inertia" and greenhouse gases persist in the atmosphere, climatic changes and their effects will intensify for many centuries even if further greenhouse gas emissions stop.

Globally, a majority of people consider global warming a serious or very serious issue. Possible societal responses to global warming include mitigation by emissions reduction, adaptation to its effects, and possible future climate engineering. Every country in the world is a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), whose ultimate objective is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change. Although the parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep cuts in emissions are required and that global warming should be limited to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F) (with efforts made to limit warming to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F)), the Earth's average surface temperature has already increased by about half this threshold. Some scientists call into question the feasibility of the 2 °C (3.6 °F) temperature target, and some question the feasibility, in higher emissions scenarios, of climate adaptation.

Observed temperature changes

Main articles: Temperature record of the past 1000 years and Instrumental temperature record

Annual temperature anomalies (thin lines) and five-year lowess smooths (thick lines) for average temperatures over the Earth's land area (red line) and sea surface over the part of the ocean that is free of ice at all times (blue line)

Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions from climate proxies, each smoothed on a decadal scale, with the instrumental temperature record starting in 1856 in black

Climate proxy records show that natural variations offset the early effects of the Industrial Revolution, so there was little net warming between the 18th century and the mid-19th century, when thermometer records began to provide global coverage. The IPCC has adopted the baseline reference period 1850–1900 as an approximation of pre-industrial global mean surface temperature.

Multiple independently produced instrumental datasets confirm that the 2009–2018 decade was 0.93 ± 0.07 °C warmer than the pre-industrial baseline (1850–1900). Currently, surface temperatures are rising by about 0.2 °C per decade. Since 1950, the number of cold days and nights have decreased, and the number of warm days and night have increased. Historical patterns of warming and cooling, like the Medieval Climate Anomaly and the Little Ice Age, were not as synchronous as current warming, but may have reached temperatures as high as those of the late-20th century in a limited set of regions.

Although the most common measure of global warming is the increase in the near-surface atmospheric temperature, over 90% of the additional energy stored in the climate system over the last 50 years has warmed ocean water. The remainder of the additional energy has melted ice and warmed the continents and the atmosphere.

The warming evident in the instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of observations, documented by many independent scientific groups; for example, in most continental regions the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation has increased. Further examples include sea level rise, widespread melting of snow and land ice, increased heat content of the oceans, increased humidity, and the earlier timing of spring events, such as the flowering of plants.

Regional trends

See also: Regional effects of global warming and Polar amplification

Global warming refers to global averages, with the amount of warming varying by region. Since 1979, global average land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as global average ocean temperatures. This is due to the larger heat capacity of oceans and because oceans lose more heat by evaporation. Patterns of warming are independent of the locations of greenhouse gas emissions because the gases persist long enough to diffuse across the planet; however, localized black carbon deposits on snow and ice do contribute to Arctic warming.

The Northern Hemisphere and North Pole have warmed much faster than the South Pole and Southern Hemisphere. The Northern Hemisphere not only has much more land, but the arrangement of land masses around the Arctic Ocean has resulted in the maximum surface area flipping from reflective snow and ice cover to ocean and land surfaces that absorb more sunlight and thus more heat. Arctic temperatures have increased and are predicted to continue to increase during this century at over twice the rate of the rest of the world. As the temperature difference between the Arctic and the equator decreases, ocean currents that are driven by that temperature difference, like the Gulf Stream, are weakening.

Short-term slowdowns and surges

Because the climate system has large thermal inertia, it can take centuries for the climate to fully adjust. While record-breaking years attract considerable public interest, individual years are less significant than the overall trend. Global surface temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations that overlie long-term trends, and can temporarily mask or magnify them. An example of such an episode is the slower rate of surface temperature increase from 1998 to 2012, which was dubbed the global warming hiatus. Throughout this period ocean heat storage continued to progress steadily upwards, and in subsequent years surface temperatures have spiked upwards. The slower pace of warming can be attributed to a combination of natural fluctuations, reduced solar activity, and increased volcanic activity.

Physical drivers of recent climate change

Radiative forcing of different contributors to climate change in 2011, as reported in the fifth IPCC assessment report. For the gases and aerosols, the values represent both the effect they have themselves and the effect of any chemical compound they get converted into in the atmosphere.

Main article: Attribution of recent climate change

By itself, the climate system experiences various cycles which can last for years (such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation) to decades or centuries. Other changes are caused by external forcings. These forcings are "external" to the climate system, but not always external to the Earth. Examples of external forcings include changes in the composition of the atmosphere (e.g., increased concentrations of greenhouse gases), solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in the Earth's orbit around the Sun.

Attributing detected temperature changes and extreme events to human-caused increases in greenhouse gases requires scientists to rule out known internal climate variability and natural external forcings. Therefore, a key approach is to use physically or statistically based computer modelling of the climate system to determine unique fingerprints for all potential causes. By comparing these fingerprints with observed patterns and evolution of climate change, and the observed evolution of the forcings, the causes of the observed changes can be determined. Scientists have determined that the major factors in the current climate change are greenhouse gases, land use changes, and aerosols and soot.

Greenhouse gases

Greenhouse effect schematic showing energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and the Earth's surface. Energy exchanges are expressed in watts per square meter (W/m²).

CO
2 concentrations over the last 800,000 years as measured from ice cores (blue/green) and directly (black)

Main articles: Greenhouse gas, Greenhouse effect, and Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere

Greenhouse gases trap heat radiating from the Earth to space. This heat, in the form of infrared radiation, gets absorbed and emitted by these gases in the atmosphere, thus warming the lower atmosphere and the surface. Before the Industrial Revolution, naturally occurring amounts of greenhouse gases caused the air near the surface to be warmer by about 33 °C (59 °F) than it would be in their absence. Without the Earth's atmosphere, the Earth's average temperature would be well below the freezing temperature of water. The major greenhouse gases are water vapour, which causes about 36–70% of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO₂), which causes 9–26%; methane (CH₄), which causes 4–9%; and ozone (O₃), which causes 3–7%.

Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO₂, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs, and nitrous oxide. As of 2011, the concentrations of CO₂ and methane had increased by about 40% and 150%, respectively, since pre-industrial times. In 2013, CO₂ readings taken at the world's primary benchmark site in Mauna Loa surpassing 400 ppm for the first time. These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 800,000 years, the period for which reliable data have been collected from ice cores. Less direct geological evidence indicates that CO₂ values have not been this high for millions of years.

Global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in 2010 were equivalent to 49 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (using the most recent global warming potentials over 100 years from the AR5 report). Of these emissions, 65% was carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and industry, 11% was carbon dioxide from land use change, which is primarily due to deforestation, 16% was from methane, 6.2% was from nitrous oxide, and 2.0% was from fluorinated gases. Using life-cycle assessment to estimate emissions relating to final consumption, the dominant sources of 2010 emissions were: food (26–30% of emissions); washing, heating, and lighting (26%); personal transport and freight (20%); and building construction (15%).

Land use change

Changing the type of vegetation in a region impacts the local temperature by changing how much sunlight gets reflected back into space, called albedo, and how much heat is lost by evaporation. For instance, the change from a dark forest to grassland makes the surface lighter, and causes it to reflect more sunlight. Humans change the land surface mainly to create more agricultural land. Since the pre-industrial era, albedo has increased due to land use change, which has a cooling effect on the planet. Other processes linked to land use change however have had the opposite effect, so that the net effect remains unclear.

Aerosols and soot

Ship tracks can be seen as lines in these clouds over the Atlantic Ocean on the East Coast of the United States, an example of the Twomey effect.

Solid and liquid particles known as aerosols – from volcanoes, plankton, and human-made pollutants – reflect incoming sunlight, cooling the climate. From 1961 to 1990, a gradual reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface was observed, a phenomenon popularly known as global dimming, typically attributed to aerosols from biofuel and fossil fuel burning. Aerosol removal by precipitation gives tropospheric aerosols an atmospheric lifetime of only about a week, while stratospheric aerosols can remain in the atmosphere for a few years. Globally, aerosols have been declining since 1990, removing some of the masking of global warming that they had been providing.

In addition to their direct effect by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, aerosols have indirect effects on the Earth's radiation budget. Sulfate aerosols act as cloud condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer and larger droplets, a phenomenon known as the Twomey effect. This effect also causes droplets to be of more uniform size, which reduces the growth of raindrops and makes clouds more reflective to incoming sunlight, known as the Albrecht effect. Indirect effects of aerosols are the largest uncertainty in radiative forcing.

While aerosols typically limit global warming by reflecting sunlight, black carbon in soot that falls on snow or ice can contribute to global warming. Not only does this increase the absorption of sunlight, it also increases melting and sea level rise. Limiting new black carbon deposits in the Arctic could reduce global warming by 0.2 °C by 2050. When soot is suspended in the atmosphere, it directly absorbs solar radiation, heating the atmosphere and cooling the surface. In areas with high soot production, such as rural India, as much as 50% of surface warming due to greenhouse gases may be masked by atmospheric brown clouds. The influences of atmospheric particles, including black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and northern mid-latitudes, with the effects of greenhouse gases dominant in the other parts of the world.

Minor forcings: the Sun and short-lived greenhouse gases

Further information: Solar activity and climate

As the Sun is the Earth's primary energy source, changes in incoming sunlight directly affect the climate system. Solar irradiance has been measured directly by satellites, and indirect measurements are available beginning in the early 1600s. There has been no upward trend in the amount of the Sun's energy reaching the Earth, so it cannot be responsible for the current warming. Physical climate models are also unable to reproduce the rapid warming observed in recent decades when taking into account only variations in solar output and volcanic activity. Another line of evidence for the warming not being due to the Sun is how temperature changes differ at different levels in the Earth's atmosphere. According to basic physical principles, the greenhouse effect produces warming of the lower atmosphere (the troposphere), but cooling of the upper atmosphere (the stratosphere). If solar variations were responsible for the observed warming, warming of both the troposphere and the stratosphere would be expected, but that has not been the case.

Ozone in the lowest layer of the atmosphere, the troposphere, is itself a greenhouse gas. Furthermore, it is highly reactive and interacts with other greenhouse gases and aerosols.

Climate change feedback

Main articles: Climate change feedback and Climate sensitivity

The dark ocean surface reflects only 6 percent of incoming solar radiation, whereas sea ice reflects 50 to 70 percent.

The response of the climate system to an initial forcing is increased by positive feedbacks and reduced by negative feedbacks. The main negative feedback to global temperature change is radiative cooling to space as infrared radiation, which increases strongly with increasing temperature. The main positive feedbacks are the water vapour feedback, the ice–albedo feedback, and probably the net effect of clouds. Uncertainty over feedbacks is the major reason why different climate models project different magnitudes of warming for a given amount of emissions.

As air gets warmer, it can hold more moisture. After an initial warming due to emissions of greenhouse gases, the atmosphere will hold more water. As water is a potent greenhouse gas, this further heats the climate: the water vapour feedback. The reduction of snow cover and sea ice in the Arctic reduces the albedo (reflectivity) of the Earth's surface. More of the sun's energy is now absorbed in these regions, contributing to Arctic amplification, which has caused Arctic temperatures to increase at almost twice the rate of the rest of the world. Arctic amplification also causes methane to be released as permafrost melts, which is expected to surpass land use changes as the second strongest anthropogenic source of greenhouse gases by the end of the century.

Cloud cover may change in the future. If cloud cover increases, more sunlight will be reflected back into space, cooling the planet. Simultaneously, the clouds enhance the greenhouse effect, warming the planet. The opposite is true if cloud cover decreases. It depends on the cloud type and location which process is more important. Overall, the net feedback over the industrial era has probably been positive. An analysis of satellite data between 1983 and 2009 reveals that cloud tops are reaching higher into the atmosphere and that cloudy storm tracks are shifting toward Earth's poles, suggesting clouds will be a positive feedback in the future.

Carbon dioxide stimulates plant growth so the carbon cycle has been a negative feedback so far: roughly half of each year's CO₂ emissions have been absorbed by plants on land and in oceans, with an estimated 30% increase in plant growth from 2000 to 2017. The limits and reversal point for this feedback are an area of uncertainty. As more CO₂ and heat are absorbed by the ocean it is acidifying and ocean circulation can change, changing the rate at which the ocean can absorb atmospheric carbon. On land, greater plant growth will be constrained by nitrogen levels and can be reversed by plant heat stress, desertification, and the release of carbon from soil as the ground warms.

A concern is that positive feedbacks will lead to a tipping point, where global temperatures transition to a hothouse climate state even if greenhouse gas emissions are reduced or eliminated. A 2018 study tried to identify such a planetary threshold for self-reinforcing feedbacks and found that even a 2 °C (3.6 °F) increase in temperature over pre-industrial levels, may be enough to trigger such a hothouse Earth scenario.

Climate models

Future CO₂ projections, including all forcing agents' atmospheric CO₂-equivalent concentrations (in parts-per-million-by-volume (ppmv)) according to four RCPs (Representative Concentration Pathways).

Projected change in annual mean surface air temperature from the late 20th century to the middle 21st century, based on a medium emissions scenario. This scenario assumes that no future policies are adopted to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Image credit: NOAA GFDL.

Main article: Global climate model

A climate model is a representation of the physical, chemical and biological processes that affect the climate system. Computer models are run on supercomputers to reproduce and predict the circulation of the oceans, the annual cycle of the seasons, and the flows of carbon between the land surface and the atmosphere. There are more than two dozen scientific institutions that develop climate models. Model forecasts vary due to different greenhouse gas inputs and different assumptions about the impact of different feedbacks on climate sensitivity.

A subset of climate models add societal factors to a simple physical climate model. These models simulate how population, economic growth and energy use affect – and interact with – the physical climate. With this information, scientists can produce scenarios of how greenhouse gas emissions may vary in the future. Scientists can then run these scenarios through physical climate models to generate climate change projection.

Climate models include different external forcings for their models. For different greenhouse gas inputs four RCPs (Representative Concentration Pathways) are used: "a stringent mitigation scenario (RCP2.6), two intermediate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP6.0) and one scenario with very high GHG emissions (RCP8.5). Models also include changes in the Earth's orbit, historical changes in the sun's activity and volcanic forcing. RCPs only look at concentrations of greenhouse gases, factoring out uncertainty as to whether the carbon cycle will continue to remove about half of the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year.

The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate contemporary or past climates. Past models have underestimated the rate of Arctic shrinkage and underestimated the rate of precipitation increase. Sea level rise since 1990 was underestimated in older models, but now agrees well with observations. The 2017 United States-published National Climate Assessment notes that "climate models may still be underestimating or missing relevant feedback processes".

Effects

Main article: Effects of global warming

Historical sea level reconstruction and projections up to 2100 published in January 2017 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program for the Fourth National Climate Assessment.

Map of the Earth with a six-meter sea level rise represented in red.

Physical environmental

Main article: Physical impacts of climate change

The environmental effects of global warming are broad and far-reaching. They include the following diverse effects:

Arctic sea ice decline, sea level rise, retreat of glaciers: global warming has led to decades of shrinking and thinning of the Arctic sea ice, making it vulnerable to atmospheric anomalies. Projections of declines in Arctic sea ice vary. Recent projections suggest that Arctic summers could be ice-free (defined as an ice extent of less than 1 million square km) as early as 2025–2030. Between 1993 and 2017, sea level rose on average with 3.1 ± 0.3 mm per year, with an acceleration detected as well. Over the 21st century, the IPCC projects (for a high emissions scenario) that global mean sea level could rise by 52–98 cm. The rate of ice loss from glaciers and ice sheets in the Antarctic is a key area of uncertainty since Antarctica contains 90% of potential sea level rise. Polar amplification and increased ocean warmth are undermining and threatening to unplug Antarctic glacier outlets, potentially resulting in more rapid sea level rise.

Extreme weather, extreme events, tropical cyclones: Globally, many regions have probably already seen increases in warm spells and heat waves and it's virtually certain these changes continue over the 21st century. From the 1950s, droughts and heat waves appear simultaneously with increased frequency. Extremely wet or dry events within the monsoon period have increased since 1980. Various mechanisms have been identified that might explain extreme weather in mid-latitudes from the rapidly warming Arctic, such as the jet stream becoming more erratic. Maximum rainfall and wind speed from hurricanes and typhoons are likely increasing.

Changes in ocean properties: increases in atmospheric CO₂ concentrations have led to an increase in dissolved CO₂ and as a consequence ocean acidity. Furthermore, oxygen levels decrease because oxygen is less soluble in warmer water, an effect known as ocean deoxygenation.

Long-term effects of global warming: On the timescale of centuries to millennia, the magnitude of global warming will be determined primarily by anthropogenic CO₂ emissions. This is due to carbon dioxide's very long lifetime in the atmosphere. Long-term effects also include a response from the Earth's crust, due to ice melting and deglaciation, in a process called post-glacial rebound, when land masses are no longer depressed by the weight of ice. This could lead to landslides and increased seismic and volcanic activities. Tsunamis could be generated by submarine landslides caused by warmer ocean water thawing ocean-floor permafrost or releasing gas hydrates. Sea level rise will continue over many centuries.

Abrupt climate change, tipping points in the climate system: Climate change could result in global, large-scale changes. Some large-scale changes could occur abruptly, i.e. over a short time period, and might also be irreversible. Examples of abrupt climate change are the rapid release of methane and carbon dioxide from permafrost, which would lead to amplified global warming. Another example is the possibility for the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to slow or to shut down (see also shutdown of thermohaline circulation). This could trigger cooling in the North Atlantic, Europe, and North America.

Biosphere

As the climate change melts sea ice, the U.S. Geological Survey projects that two-thirds of polar bears will disappear by 2050.

Main article: Climate change and ecosystems

Ecosystem changes: In terrestrial ecosystems, the earlier timing of spring events, as well as poleward and upward shifts in plant and animal ranges, have been linked with high confidence to recent warming. It is expected that most ecosystems will be affected by higher atmospheric CO₂ levels, combined with higher global temperatures. Expansion of deserts in the subtropics is probably linked to global warming. Ocean acidification threatens damage to coral reefs, fisheries, protected species, and other natural resources of value to society. Without substantial actions to reduce the rate of global warming, land-based ecosystems are at risk of major ecological shifts, transforming composition and structure.

Overall, it is expected that climate change will result in the extinction of many species and reduced diversity of ecosystems. Rising temperatures have been found to push bees to their physiological limits, and could cause the extinction of bee populations. Continued ocean uptake of CO₂ may affect the brains and central nervous system of certain fish species, and that this impacts their ability to hear, smell, and evade predators.

Impacts on humans

Further information: Effects of global warming on human health, Climate security, Economics of global warming, and Climate change and agriculture

A helicopter drops water on a wildfire in California. Drought and higher temperatures linked to climate change are driving a trend towards larger fires.

The effects of climate change on human systems, mostly due to warming or shifts in precipitation patterns, or both, have been detected worldwide. The future social impacts of climate change will be uneven across the world. All regions are at risk of experiencing negative impacts, with low-latitude, less developed areas facing the greatest risk. Global warming has likely already increased global economic inequality, and is projected to do so in the future. Regional impacts of climate change are now observable on all continents and across ocean regions. The Arctic, Africa, small islands and Asian megadeltas are regions that are likely to be especially affected by future climate change. Many risks increase with higher magnitudes of global warming.

Food and water

Crop production will probably be negatively affected in low latitude countries, while effects at northern latitudes may be positive or negative. Global warming of around 4 °C relative to late 20th century levels could pose a large risk to global and regional food security. The impact of climate change on crop productivity for the four major crops was negative for wheat and maize, and neutral for soy and rice, in the years 1960–2013. Climate variability and change is projected to severely compromise agricultural production, including access to food, across Africa. By 2050, between 350 million and 600 million people are projected to experience increased water stress due to climate change in Africa. Water availability will also become more limited in regions dependent on glacier water, regions with reductions in rainfall and small islands.

Health and security

Aerial view over southern Bangladesh after the passage of cyclone Cyclone Sidr. A combination of sea level rise and increased rainfall from cyclones makes countries more vulnerable to floods, impacting people's livelihoods and health.

Generally impacts on public health will be more negative than positive. Impacts include the direct effects of extreme weather, leading to injury and loss of life; and indirect effects, such as undernutrition brought on by crop failures. There has been a shift from cold- to heat-related mortality in some regions as a result of warming. Temperature rise has been connected to increased numbers of suicides. Climate change has been linked to an increase in violent conflict by amplifying poverty and economic shocks, which are well-documented drivers of these conflicts. Links have been made between a wide range of violent behaviour including fist fights, violent crimes, civil unrest, or wars. Climate change may also lead to new human diseases. For example, while ordinary temperature usually kill off candida auris before it infects humans, three strains have recently appeared in widely separate regions, leading researches to postulate that warmer temperatures are driving the fungus to adapt to higher temperatures at which it can more readily infect humans.

Livelihoods, industry and infrastructure

In small islands and mega deltas, inundation as a result of sea level rise is expected to threaten vital infrastructure and human settlements. This could lead to issues of homelessness in countries with low-lying areas such as Bangladesh, as well as statelessness for populations in island nations, such as the Maldives and Tuvalu. Climate change can be an important driver of migration, both within and between countries.

Africa is one of the most vulnerable continents to climate variability and change because of multiple existing stresses and low adaptive capacity. Existing stresses include poverty, political conflicts, and ecosystem degradation. Regions may even become uninhabitable, with humidity and temperature reaching levels too high for humans to survive.

Responses

Mitigation of and adaptation to climate change are two complementary responses to global warming. Successful adaptation is easier in the case of substantial emission reduction. Many of the countries that contributed least to global greenhouse gas emissions are most vulnerable to climate change, which raises questions about justice and fairness with regard to mitigation and adaptation.

Mitigation

Main article: Climate change mitigation

The graph on the right shows three "pathways" to meet the UNFCCC's 2 °C target, labelled "global technology", "decentralized solutions", and "consumption change". Each pathway shows how various measures (e.g., improved energy efficiency, increased use of renewable energy) could contribute to emissions reductions. Image credit: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Annual greenhouse gas emissions attributed to different sectors as of the year 2010. Emissions are given as a percentage share of total emissions, measured in carbon dioxide-equivalents, using global warming potentials from the IPCC fifth Assessment Report.

Mitigation of climate change is the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, or the enhancement of the capacity of carbon sinks to absorb greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. There is a large potential for future reductions in emissions by a combination of activities, including energy conservation and increased energy efficiency; the use of low-carbon energy technologies, such as renewable energy, nuclear energy, and carbon capture and storage; decarbonizing buildings and transport; and enhancing carbon sinks through, for example, reforestation and preventing deforestation. A 2015 report by Citibank concluded that transitioning to a low carbon economy would yield positive return on investments.

Global carbon dioxide emissions by country in 2015

Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions

Over the last three decades of the twentieth century, gross domestic product per capita and population growth were the main drivers of increases in greenhouse gas emissions. CO₂ emissions are continuing to rise due to the burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. Emissions can be attributed to different regions. Attribution of emissions due to land-use change are subject to considerable uncertainty.

Emissions scenarios, estimates of changes in future emission levels of greenhouse gases, have been projected that depend upon uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural developments. In some scenarios emissions continue to rise over the century, while others have reduced emissions. Fossil fuel reserves are abundant, and will not limit carbon emissions in the 21st century. Emission scenarios, combined with modelling of the carbon cycle, have been used to produce estimates of how atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases might change in the future. Depending both on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) the world takes and the mitigation scenario, model suggest that by the year 2100, the atmospheric concentration of CO₂ could range between 380 and 1400 ppm.

Reducing greenhouse gases

Near- and long-term trends in the global energy system are inconsistent with limiting global warming at below 1.5 or 2 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Current pledges made as part of the Paris Agreement would lead to about 3.0 °C of warming at the end of the 21st century, relative to pre-industrial levels. In limiting warming at below 2 °C, more stringent emission reductions in the near-term would allow for less rapid reductions after 2030, and be cheaper overall. To achieve warming under 1.5 degrees a far-reaching system change on an unprecedented scale is necessary in energy, land, cities, transport, buildings and industry.

Although low level ozone is harmful, when in the stratosphere ozone is beneficial. As many of the substances which can cause stratospheric ozone depletion are also greenhouse gases, the Montreal protocol against their emissions may have done more than any other measure, as of 2017, to mitigate climate change.

Co-benefits of climate change mitigation may help society and individuals more quickly. For example, cycling reduces greenhouse gas emissions while reducing the effects of a sedentary lifestyle at the same time. The development and scaling-up of clean technology, such as cement that produces less CO₂. is critical to achieve sufficient emission reductions for the Paris agreement goals. Many integrated models are unable to meet the 2 °C target if pessimistic assumptions are made about the availability of mitigation technologies.

It has been suggested that the most effective and comprehensive policy to reduce carbon emissions is a carbon tax or the closely related emissions trading. There are diverse opinions on how people could mitigate their carbon footprint. One suggestion is that the best approach is having fewer children, and to a lesser extent living car-free, forgoing air travel, and adopting a plant-based diet. Some disagree with encouraging people to stop having children, saying that children "embody a profound hope for the future", and that more emphasis should be placed on overconsumption, lifestyle choices of the world's wealthy, fossil fuel companies and government inaction.

Adaptation

Main article: Climate change adaptation

Climate change adaptation is the process of adjusting to actual or expected climate and its effects. Humans can strive to moderate or avoid harm due to climate change and exploit opportunities. Examples of adaptation are improved coastline protection, better disaster management and the development of crops that are more resistant. The adaptation may be planned, either in reaction to or anticipation of global warming, or spontaneous, i.e., without government intervention.

The public section, private sector and communities are all gaining experience with adaptation and adaptation is becoming embedded within certain planning processes. While some adaptation responses call for trade-offs, others bring synergies and co-benefits. Environmental organizations and public figures have emphasized changes in the climate and the risks they entail, while promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions reductions.

Adaptation is especially important in developing countries since those countries are predicted to bear the brunt of the effects of global warming. That is, the capacity and potential for humans to adapt, called adaptive capacity, is unevenly distributed across different regions and populations, and developing countries generally have less capacity to adapt. In June 2019, U.N. special rapporteur Philip Alston warned of a 'climate apartheid' situation developing, where global warming "could push more than 120 million more people into poverty by 2030 and will have the most severe impact in poor countries, regions, and the places poor people live and work."

Climate engineering

Main article: Climate engineering

Climate engineering (sometimes called geoengineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate modification of the climate. It has been investigated as a possible response to global warming, e.g. by NASA and the Royal Society. Techniques under research fall generally into the categories solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal, although various other schemes have been suggested. A study from 2014 investigated the most common climate engineering methods and concluded they are either ineffective or have potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid climate change.

Society and culture

Political response

Main article: Politics of global warming

Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention refers explicitly to "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations". To stabilize the atmospheric concentration of CO
₂, emissions worldwide would need to be dramatically reduced from their present level.

As of 2019 all countries in the world are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), but 12 countries have not ratified it, which means they are not legally bound by the agreement. The ultimate objective of the Convention is to prevent dangerous human interference to the climate system. As stated in the Convention, this requires that greenhouse gas concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level where ecosystems can adapt naturally to climate change, food production is not threatened, and economic development can be sustained. The Framework Convention was agreed on in 1992, but global emissions have risen since then. Its yearly conferences are the stage of global negotiations.

During these negotiations, the G77 (a lobbying group in the United Nations representing developing countries) pushed for a mandate requiring developed countries to "[take] the lead" in reducing their emissions. This was justified on the basis that the developed countries' emissions had contributed most to the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, per-capita emissions (i.e., emissions per head of population) were still relatively low in developing countries, and the emissions of developing countries would grow to meet their development needs.

This mandate was sustained in the 2005 Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention. In ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, most developed countries accepted legally binding commitments to limit their emissions. These first-round commitments expired in 2012. United States President George W. Bush rejected the treaty on the basis that "it exempts 80% of the world, including major population centres such as China and India, from compliance, and would cause serious harm to the US economy".

In 2009 several UNFCCC Parties produced the Copenhagen Accord, which has been widely portrayed as disappointing because of its low goals, leading poor nations to reject it. Parties associated with the Accord aim to limit the future increase in global mean temperature to below 2 °C. In 2015 all UN countries negotiated the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep climate change well below 2 °C. The agreement replaced the Kyoto protocol. Unlike Kyoto, no binding emission targets are set in the Paris agreement. Instead, the procedure of regularly setting ever more ambitious goals and reevaluating these goals every five years has been made binding. The Paris agreement reiterated that developing countries must be financially supported.

Scientific discussion

Main article: Scientific consensus on climate change

In the scientific literature, there is an overwhelming consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view. Scientific discussion takes place in journal articles that are peer-reviewed, which scientists subject to assessment every couple of years in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. The scientific consensus as of 2013 stated in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report is that it "is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century".

National science academies have called on world leaders for policies to cut global emissions. In November 2017, a second warning to humanity signed by 15,364 scientists from 184 countries stated that "the current trajectory of potentially catastrophic climate change due to rising greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and agricultural production – particularly from farming ruminants for meat consumption" is "especially troubling". In 2018 the IPCC published a Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C which warned that, if the current rate of greenhouse gas emissions is not mitigated, global warming is likely to reach 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) between 2030 and 2052 risking major crises. The report said that preventing such crises will require a swift transformation of the global economy that has "no documented historic precedent".

Fossil fuel companies

See also: Fossil fuels lobby

In the 20th century and early 2000s some companies, such as ExxonMobil, challenged IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who disagreed with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls. In general, since the 2010s, global oil companies do not dispute that climate change exists and is caused by the burning of fossil fuels. As of 2019, however, some are lobbying against a carbon tax and plan to increase production of oil and gas but others are in favour of a carbon tax in exchange for immunity from lawsuits which seek climate change compensation.

Public opinion and disputes

Further information: Climate change denial, Media coverage of climate change, and Public opinion on climate change

Global warming was the cover story in this 2007 issue of Ms. magazine

The global warming problem came to international public attention in the late 1980s. Significant regional differences exists in how concerned people are about climate change and how much they understand the issue. In 2010, just a little over half the US population viewed it as a serious concern for either themselves or their families, while people in Latin America and developed Asia saw themselves most at risk at 73% and 74%. Similarly, in 2015 a median of 54% of respondents consider it "a very serious problem", Americans and Chinese (whose economies are responsible for the greatest annual CO₂ emissions) were among the least concerned. Worldwide in 2011, people were more likely to attribute global warming to human activities than to natural causes, except in the US where nearly half of the population attributed global warming to natural causes. Public reactions to global warming and concern about its effects have been increasing, with many perceiving it as the worst global threat.

From about 1990 onward, American conservative think tanks had begun challenging the legitimacy of global warming as a social problem. They challenged the scientific evidence, argued that global warming would have benefits, and asserted that proposed solutions would do more harm than good. Organizations such as the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, conservative commentators have challenged IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls.

Global warming has been the subject of controversy, substantially more pronounced in the popular media than in the scientific literature, with disputes regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming. The disputed issues include the causes of increased global average air temperature, especially since the mid-20th century, whether this warming trend is unprecedented or within normal climatic variations, whether humankind has contributed significantly to it, and whether the increase is completely or partially an artifact of poor measurements. Additional disputes concern estimates of climate sensitivity, predictions of additional warming, what the consequences of global warming will be, and what to do about it.

Due to confusing media coverage in the early 1990s, issues such as ozone depletion and climate change were often mixed up, affecting public understanding of these issues. Although there are a few areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is weak.

The climate movement

In a response to perceived inaction on climate change, a climate movement is protesting in various ways, such as fossil fuel divestment, worldwide demonstrations and the school strike for climate. Climate change is increasingly a theme in art, literature and film. Mass civil disobedience actions by Extinction Rebellion and Ende Gelände have ended in police intervention large-scale arrests.

History of the science

Scientific American description of 1856 Eunice Newton Foote's experiments which found that carbonic acid (CO₂) causes warming.

The history of climate change science began in the early 19th century when ice ages and other natural changes in paleoclimate were first suspected and the natural greenhouse effect first identified. In the late 19th century, scientists first argued that human emissions of greenhouse gases could change the climate. In the 1960s, the warming effect of carbon dioxide gas became increasingly convincing. By the 1990s, as a result of improving fidelity of computer models and observational work confirming the Milankovitch theory of the ice ages, a consensus position formed: greenhouse gases were deeply involved in most climate changes, and human-caused emissions were bringing discernible global warming. Since then, scientific research on climate change has expanded. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, set up in the 1990s to provide formal advice the world's governments, spurred unprecedented levels of exchange between different scientific disciplines.

The greenhouse effect was proposed by Joseph Fourier in 1824, discovered in 1856 by Eunice Newton Foote, expanded upon by John Tyndall, investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896, and the hypothesis was reported in the popular press as early as 1912. The scientific description of global warming was further developed in the 1930s through the 1960s by Guy Stewart Callendar.

Terminology

Research in the 1950s suggested increasing temperatures, and a 1952 newspaper reported "climate change". This phrase next appeared in a November 1957 report in The Hammond Times which described Roger Revelle's research into the effects of increasing human-caused CO
2 emissions on the greenhouse effect "a large scale global warming, with radical climate changes may result". A 1971 MIT report, referred to the human impact as "inadvertent climate modification", identifying many possible causes.

Both the terms global warming and climate change were used only occasionally until 1975, when Wallace Smith Broecker published a scientific paper on the topic, "Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?" The phrase began to come into common use, and in 1976 Mikhail Budyko's statement that "a global warming up has started" was widely reported. An influential 1979 National Academy of Sciences study headed by Jule Charney followed Broecker in using global warming to refer to rising surface temperatures, while describing the wider effects of increased CO
2 as climate change.

There were increasing heatwaves and drought problems in the summer of 1988, and when NASA climate scientist James Hansen gave testimony in the U.S. Senate, it sparked worldwide interest. He said "global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming". Public attention increased over the summer, and global warming became the dominant popular term, commonly used both by the press and in public discourse. In the 2000s, the term climate change increased in popularity.

People who regard climate change as catastrophic, irreversible or rapid might label climate change as a climate crisis or a climate emergency. Some major newspapers, such as The Guardian, have taken up the use of this terminology, as well as the term global heating, in order to emphasize its seriousness and urgency. Since 2016, some city councils have issued climate emergency declarations. In 2019, the British Parliament became the first national government in the world to officially declare a climate emergency.

See also

• Anthropocene – proposed geological time interval for a new period where humans are having significant geological impact
• Global cooling – minority view held by scientists in the 1970s that imminent cooling of the Earth would take place
• Holocene extinction
• Planetary boundaries – global warming is one of them

Sources

IPCC reports

TAR Working Group II Report

• IPCC (2001). McCarthy, J.J.; Canziani, O.F.; Leary, N.A.; Dokken, D.J.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-80768-9. pb: 0 521-01500-6
  • Smit, B.; Pilifosova, O.; Burton, I.; Challenger, B.; et al. (2001). "Chapter 18: Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity" (PDF). IPCC TAR WG2 2001. pp. 877–912.
  • Smith, J.B.; Schellnhuber, H.-J.; Mirza, M.M.Q.; Fankhauser, S.; et al. (2001). "Chapter 19: Vulnerability to Climate Change and Reasons for Concern: A Synthesis" (PDF). IPCC TAR WG2 2001. pp. 913–967.

TAR Working Group III Report

• IPCC (2001). Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; Swart, R.; Pan, J. (eds.). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation (PDF). Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-80769-7. pb: 0-521-01502-2
  • IPCC (2001). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC TAR WG3 2001. pp. 1–13.

AR4 Working Group I Report

• IPCC (2007). Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88009-1. (pb: 978-0-521-70596-7).
  • IPCC (2007). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 1–18.
  • Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Alley, R.B.; et al. (2007). "Technical Summary" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 19–91.
  • Le Treut, H.; Somerville, R.; Cubasch, U.; Ding, Y.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climate Change Science" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 93–127.
  • Randall, D.A.; Wood, R.A.; Bony, S.; Colman, R.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 8: Climate Models and their Evaluation" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 589–662.
  • Hegerl, G.C.; Zwiers, F.W.; Braconnot, P.; Gillett, N.P.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 9: Understanding and Attributing Climate Change" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 663–745.
  • Meehl, G.A.; Stocker, T.F.; Collins, W.D.; Friedlingstein, P.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG1 2007. pp. 747–845.

AR4 Working Group II Report

• IPCC (2007). Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P.; van der Linden, P.J.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88010-7. (pb: 978-0-521-70597-4).
  • IPCC (2007). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 7–22.
  • Rosenzweig, C.; Casassa, G.; Karoly, D.J.; Imeson, A.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 1: Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 79–131.
  • Kundzewicz, Z.W.; Mata, L.J.; Arnell, N.W.; Döll, P.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 3: Freshwater resources and their management" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 173–210.
  • Fischlin, A.; Midgley, G.F.; Price, J.T.; Leemans, R.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 4: Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 211–272.
  • Mimura, N.; Nurse, L.; McLean, R.F.; Agard, J.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 16: Small islands" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 687–716.
  • Schneider, S.H.; Semenov, S.; Patwardhan, A.; Burton, I.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 19: Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. pp. 779–810.

AR4 Working Group III Report

• IPCC (2007). Metz, B.; Davidson, O.R.; Bosch, P.R.; Dave, R.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88011-4. (pb: 978-0-521-70598-1).
  • Rogner, H.-H.; Zhou, D.; Bradley, R.; Crabbé, P.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 1: Introduction" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG3 2007. pp. 95–116.
  • Fisher, B.S.; Nakicenovic, N.; Alfsen, K.; Corfee Morlot, J.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 3: Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context" (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG3 2007. pp. 169–250.

AR4 Synthesis Report

• IPCC (2007). Core Writing Team; Pachuri, R.K.; Reisinger, A. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. ISBN 978-92-9169-122-7.
  • "Annex II: Glossary". IPCC AR4 SYR 2007. 2007. pp. 76–89.

AR5 Working Group I Report

• IPCC (2013). Stocker, T. F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (PDF). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-9. (pb: 978-1-107-66182-0).
  • IPCC (2013). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
  • Stocker, T. F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Alexander, L. V.; et al. (2013). "Technical Summary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 33–115.
  • Cubasch, U.; Wuebbles, D.; Chen, D.; Facchini, M. C.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 1: Introduction" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 119–158.
  • Hartmann, D. L.; Klein Tank, A. M. G.; Rusticucci, M.; Alexander, L. V.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 2: Observations: Atmosphere and Surface" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 159–254.
  • Rhein, M.; Rintoul, S. R.; Aoki, S.; Campos, E.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 3: Observations: Ocean" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 255–315.
  • Vaughan, D. G.; Comiso, J. C.; Allison, I.; Carrasco, J.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 4: Observations: Cryosphere" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 317–382.
  • Masson-Delmotte, V.; Schulz, M.; Abe-Ouchi, A.; Beer, J.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 5: Information from Paleoclimate Archives" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 383–464.
  • Ciais, P.; Sabine, C.; Bala, G.; Bopp, L.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 6: Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 465–470.
  • Boucher, O.; Randall, D.; Artaxo, P.; Bretherton, C.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 7: Clouds and Aerosols" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 571–657.
  • Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.-M.; Collins, W.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 659–740.
  • Flato, G.; Marotzke, J.; Abiodun, B.; Braconnot, P.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 9: Evaluation of Climate Models" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 741–866.
  • Bindoff, N. L.; Stott, P. A.; AchutaRao, K. M.; Allen, M. R.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 10: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 867–952.
  • Kirtman, B.; Power, S.; Adedoyin, J.A.; Boer, G.J.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 11: Near-term Climate Change: Projections and Predictability" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 953–1028.
  • Collins, M.; Knutti, R.; Arblaster, J. M.; Dufresne, J.-L.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 12: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 1029–1136.
  • Church, J. A.; Clark, P. U.; Cazenave, A.; Gregory, J. M.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 13: Sea Level Change" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 1137–1216.
  • Christensen, J.H.; Krishna Kumar, K.; Aldrian, E.; An, S.-I.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 14: Climate Phenomena and their Relevance for Future Regional Climate Change" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 1217–1308.
  • IPCC (2013). "Annex III: Glossary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG1 2013. pp. 1311–1393.

AR5 Working Group II Report

• IPCC (2014). Field, C.B.; Barros, V.R.; Dokken, D.J.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05807-1. (pb: 978-1-107-64165-5). Chapters 1–20, SPM, and Technical Summary.
• IPCC (2014). Barros, V.R.; Field, C.B.; Dokken, D.J.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05816-3. (pb: 978-1-107-68386-0). Chapters 21–30, Annexes, and Index.
  • IPCC (2014). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 1–32.
  • Field, C.B.; Barros, V.R.; Mach, K.J.; Mastrandrea, M.D.; et al. (2014). "Technical Summary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 35–94.
  • Porter, J.R.; Xie, L.; Challinor, A.J.; Cochrane, K.; et al. (2014). "Chapter 7: Food Security and Food Production Systems" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 485–533.
  • Smith, K. R.; Woodward, A.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Chadee, D. D.; et al. (2014). "Chapter 11: Human Health: Impacts, Adaptation, and Co-Benefits" (PDF). In IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 709–754.
  • Cramer, W.; Yohe, G.W.; Auffhammer, M.; Huggel, C.; et al. (2014). "Chapter 18: Detection and Attribution of Observed Impacts" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 979–1037.
  • Oppenheimer, M.; Campos, M.; Warren, R.; Birkmann, J.; et al. (2014). "Chapter 19: Emergent Risks and Key Vulnerabilities" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014. pp. 1039–1099.
  • IPCC (2014). "Annex II: Glossary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG2 B 2014. pp. 1757–1776.

AR5 Working Group III Report

• IPCC (2014). Edenhofer, O.; Pichs-Madruga, R.; Sokona, Y.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05821-7. (pb: 978-1-107-65481-5).
  • IPCC (2014). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG3 2014.
  • Edenhofer, O.; Pichs-Madruga, R.; Sokona, Y.; Kadner, S.; et al. (2014). "Technical Summary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG3 2014.
  • Clarke, L.; Jiang, K.; Akimoto, K.; Babiker, M.; et al. (2014). "Chapter 6: Assessing Transformation Pathways" (PDF). IPCC AR5 WG3 2014.

AR5 Synthesis Report

• IPCC AR5 SYR (2014). The Core Writing Team; Pachauri, R.K.; Meyer, L.A. (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  • IPCC (2014). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC AR5 SYR 2014.
  • IPCC (2014). "Annex II: Glossary" (PDF). IPCC AR5 SYR 2014.

Special Report: SREX

• IPCC (2012). Field, C.B.; Barros, V.; Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Dokken, D.J.; Ebi, K.L.; Mastrandrea, M.D.; Mach, K.J.; Plattner, G.-K.; Allen, S.K.; Tignor, M.; Midgley, P.M. (eds.). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (PDF). A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. p. 582. ISBN 978-1-107-02506-6.
  • IPCC (2012). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC SREX 2012. pp. 1–19.

Special Report: SR15

• IPCC (2018). Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pörtner, H. O.; Roberts, D.; et al. (eds.). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. In Press.
  • IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization. IPCC SR15 SPM as printed by the WMO.
  • IPCC (2018). "Summary for Policymakers". IPCC SR15 2018. pp. 3–21.
  • Allen, M.; de Coninck, H.; Dube, O. P.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; et al. (2018). "Technical Summary". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • Allen, M.; Dube, O. P.; Solecki, W.; Aragón-Durand, F.; et al. (2018). "Chapter 1: Framing and Context". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • Rogelj, J.; Shindell, D.; Jiang, K.; Fifta, S.; et al. (2018). "Chapter 2: Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Jacob, D.; Taylor, M.; Bindi, M.; et al. (2018). "Chapter 3: Impacts of 1.5ºC Global Warming on Natural and Human". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • de Coninck, H.; Revi, A.; Babiker, M.; Bertoldi, P.; et al. (2018). "Chapter 4: Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response.". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • Roy, J.; Tschakert, P.; Waisman, H.; Abdul Halim, S.; et al. (2018). "Chapter 5: Sustainable Development, Poverty Eradication and Reducing Inequalities.". IPCC SR15 2018.
  • IPCC (2018). "Annex I: Glossary". IPCC SR15 2018.

Other peer-reviewed sources

• Bhargava, Gopal (2002). Ecological Politics: Different Dimensions. Gyan Publishing House. ISBN 9788178350196.
• Albrecht, Bruce A. (1989). "Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness". Science. 245 (4923): 1227–1239. Bibcode:1989Sci...245.1227A. doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227. PMID 17747885.
• Amstrup, S. C.; Marcot, B. G.; Douglas, D. C. (2013). "A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach to Forecasting the 21st Century Worldwide Status of Polar Bears" (PDF). Arctic Sea Ice Decline: Observations, Projections, Mechanisms, and Implications. Geophysical Monograph Series 180. pp. 213–268. doi:10.1029/180GM14. ISBN 9781118666470. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 August 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
• Andrews, Timothy; Betts, Betts; Booth, Ben; Jones, Chris; et al. (2016). "Effective radiative forcing from historical land use change". Climate Dynamics. 48 (11–12): 3489–3505. doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3280-7.
• Bajzelj, B.; Allwood, J.; Cullen, J. (2013). "Designing Climate Change Mitigation Plans That Add Up". Environmental Science and Technology. 47 (14): 8062–8069. Bibcode:2013EnST...47.8062B. doi:10.1021/es400399h. PMC 3797518.
• Barbero, R.; Abatzoglou, J. T.; Larkin, N. K.; Kolden, C. A.; et al. (2015). "Climate change presents increased potential for very large fires in the contiguous United States". International Journal of Wildland Fire. 24 (7): 892–899. doi:10.1071/WF15083. ISSN 1448-5516.
• Boykoff, Maxwell T.; Boykoff, Jules M. (2004). "Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press" (PDF). Global Environmental Change Part A. 14 (2): 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 August 2017.
• Brigham-Grette, Julie; Anderson, Scott; Clague, John; Cole, Julia; et al. (2006). "Petroleum Geologists' Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate". Eos. 87 (36): 364. Bibcode:2006EOSTr..87..364B. doi:10.1029/2006EO360008.
• Burke, Marshall; Davis, W. Matthew; Diffenbaugh, Noah S (2018). "Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets". Nature. 557 (7706): 549–553. Bibcode:2018Natur.557..549B. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0071-9. ISSN 1476-4687.
• Callendar, G. S. (1938). "The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 64 (275): 223–240. Bibcode:1938QJRMS..64..223C. doi:10.1002/qj.49706427503.
• Campbella, Bruce M.; Vermeulen, Sonja J.; Aggarwa, Pramod K.; Corner-Dolloff, Caitlin; et al. (2016). "Reducing risks to food security from climate change". Global Food Security. 11: 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.06.002.
• Cazenave, Anny; Dieng, Habib-Boubacar; Meyssignac, Benoit; von Schuckmann, Karina; Decharme, Bertrand; Berthier, Etienne (2014). "The rate of sea-level rise". Nature Climate Change. 4 (5): 358–361. doi:10.1038/nclimate2159. ISSN 1758-6798.
• Clark, Peter U.; Shakun, Jeremy D.; Marcott, Shaun A.; Mix, Alan C.; et al. (8 February 2016). "Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change" (PDF). Nature Climate Change. 6 (4): 360–369. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..360C. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2923.
• Cole, Daniel H. (2008). "Climate Change, Adaptation, and Development". UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. 26 (1).
• Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; et al. (13 April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
• Costello, Anthony; Abbas, Mustafa; Allen, Adriana; Ball, Sarah; et al. (May 2009). "Managing the health effects of climate change". The Lancet. 373 (9676): 1693–1733. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1. Archived from the original on 13 August 2017.
• Delworth, T. L.; Mann, M. E. (September 2000). "Observed and simulated multidecadal variability in the Northern Hemisphere". Climate Dynamics. 16 (9): 661–676. Bibcode:2000ClDy...16..661D. doi:10.1007/s003820000075. ISSN 1432-0894.
• Delworth, Thomas L.; Zeng, Fanrong (2012). "Multicentennial variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and its climatic influence in a 4000 year simulation of the GFDL CM2.1 climate model". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (13): n/a. Bibcode:2012GeoRL..3913702D. doi:10.1029/2012GL052107. ISSN 1944-8007.
• Dessai, Suraje (December 2001). "The climate regime from The Hague to Marrakech: Saving or sinking the Kyoto Protocol?" (PDF). Tyndall Centre Working Paper 12. Tyndall Centre. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
• Deutsch, Curtis; Brix, Holger; Ito, Taka; Frenzel, Hartmut; et al. (2011). "Climate-Forced Variability of Ocean Hypoxia" (PDF). Science. 333 (6040): 336–339. Bibcode:2011Sci...333..336D. doi:10.1126/science.1202422. PMID 21659566. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 May 2016.
• Diffenbaugh, Noah S.; Burke, Marshall (2019). "Global warming has increased global economic inequality". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (20): 9808–9813. doi:10.1073/pnas.1816020116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 31010922.
• D'Odorico, Paolo; Bhattachan, Abinash; Davis, Kyle F.; Ravi, Sujith; Runyan, Christiane W. (2013). "Global desertification: Drivers and feedbacks". Advances in Water Resources. 51: 326–344. Bibcode:2013AdWR...51..326D. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.013.
• Duveiller, Gregory; Hooker, Josh; Cescatti, Alessandro (2018). "The mark of vegetation change on Earth's surface energy balance". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 679. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9..679D. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02810-8. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5820346.
• England, Matthew H.; McGregor, Shayne; Spence, Paul; Meehl, Gerald A.; et al. (9 February 2014). "Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus" (PDF). Nature Climate Change. 4 (3): 222–227. Bibcode:2014NatCC...4..222E. doi:10.1038/nclimate2106. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
• Fahey, D. W.; Doherty, S. J.; Hibbard, K. A.; Romanou, A.; Taylor, P. C. (2017). "Chapter 2: Physical Drivers of Climate Change" (PDF). In USGCRP2017 (Report).
• Farquharson, Louise M.; Romanovsky, Vladimir E.; Cable, William L.; Walker, Donald A.; et al. (2019). "Climate change drives widespread and rapid thermokarst development in very cold permafrost in the Canadian High Arctic". Geophysical Research Letters. 46. doi:10.1029/2019GL082187. ISSN 1944-8007.
• Foote, Eunice (November 1856). "Circumstances affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays". The American Journal of Science and Arts. 22: 382–383. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
• Francis, Jennifer A.; Vavrus, Stephen (2012). "Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (6): n/a. Bibcode:2012GeoRL..39.6801F. doi:10.1029/2012GL051000.
• Fyfe, John C.; Meehl, Gerald A.; England, Matthew H.; Mann, Michael E.; et al. (March 2016). "Making sense of the early-2000s warming slowdown" (PDF). Nature Climate Change. 6 (3): 224–228. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..224F. doi:10.1038/nclimate2938. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 February 2019.
• Good, P.; Gosling, Simon N.; Bernie, Dan; Caesar, John; et al. (2010). An updated review of developments in climate science research since IPCC AR4. A report by the AVOID consortium (PDF). London: Committee on Climate Change. p. 14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2013.. Report website. Archived 18 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine
• Grubb, M. (2003). "The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol" (PDF). World Economics. 4 (3): 144–145. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2012.
• Gunningham, Neil (2018). "Mobilising civil society: can the climate movement achieve transformational social change?" (PDF). Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
• Hagmann, David; Ho, Emily H.; Loewenstein, George (2019). "Nudging out support for a carbon tax". Nature Climate Change. 9 (6): 484–489. Bibcode:2019NatCC...9..484H. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0.
• Hansen, James; Sato, Makiko; Russel, Gary; Kharecha, Pushker (September 2013). "Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide". Philosophical Transactions A. 371 (2001): 20120294. arXiv:1211.4846. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37120294H. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0294. PMC 3785813.
• He, Yanyi; Wang, Kaicun; Zhou, Chunlüe; Wild, Martin (2018). "A Revisit of Global Dimming and Brightening Based on the Sunshine Duration". Geophysical Research Letters. 45 (9): 4281–4289. Bibcode:2018GeoRL..45.4281H. doi:10.1029/2018GL077424. ISSN 1944-8007.
• Hodder, Patrick; Martin, Brian (2009). "Climate Crisis? The Politics of Emergency Framing". Economic and Political Weekly. 44 (36): 53–60. ISSN 0012-9976. JSTOR 25663518.
• IAP (June 2009). Interacademy Panel (IAP) Member Academies Statement on Ocean Acidification. Archived from the original on 6 August 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013., Secretariat: TWAS (the Academy of Sciences for the Developing World), Trieste, Italy.
• Joo, Gea-Jae; Kim, Ji Yoon; Do, Yuno; Lineman, Maurice (2015). "Talking about Climate Change and Global Warming". PLOS ONE. 10 (9): e0138996. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1038996L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138996. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4587979.
• Lüthi, Dieter; Le Floch, Martine; Bereiter, Bernhard; Blunier, Thomas; et al. (2008). "High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present". Nature. 453 (7193): 379–382. Bibcode:2008Natur.453..379L. doi:10.1038/nature06949. PMID 18480821.
• Kabir, Russell; Khan, Hafiz T. A.; Ball, Emma; Caldwell, Khan (2016). "Climate Change Impact: The Experience of the Coastal Areas of Bangladesh Affected by Cyclones Sidr and Aila". Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2016: 1–9. doi:10.1155/2016/9654753.</ref>
• Keller, David P.; Feng, Ellias Y.; Oschlies, Andreas (2014). "Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario". Nature Communications. 5: 3304. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.3304K. doi:10.1038/ncomms4304. PMC 3948393. PMID 24569320.
• Kennedy, J. J.; Thorne, W.P.; Peterson, T.C.; Ruedy, R.A.; et al. (2010). "How do we know the world has warmed? in: 2. Global Climate, in: State of the Climate in 2009". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 91 (7): 26. doi:10.1175/BAMS-91-7-StateoftheClimate.
• Kiehl, J. T.; Trenberth, Kevin E. (1997). "Earth's Annual Global Mean Energy Budget" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 78 (2): 197–208. Bibcode:1997BAMS...78..197K. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1520-0477. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2008.
• Kopp, R. E.; Hayhoe, K.; Easterling, D.R.; Hall, T.; et al. (2017). "Chapter 15: Potential Surprises: Compound Extremes and Tipping Elements". In USGCRP 2017. US National Climate Assessment. Archived from the original on 20 August 2018.
• Knowlton, Nancy (2001). "The future of coral reefs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (10): 5419–5425. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.5419K. doi:10.1073/pnas.091092998. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 33228. PMID 11344288.
• Knight, J.; Kenney, J. J.; Folland, C.; Harris, G.; Jones, G. S.; Palmer, M.; Parker, D.; Scaife, A.; Stott, P. (August 2009). "Do Global Temperature Trends Over the Last Decade Falsify Climate Predictions? [in "State of the Climate in 2008"]". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 90 (8): S75–S79. doi:10.1175/BAMS-91-7-StateoftheClimate.
• Kossin, J. P.; Hall, T.; Knutson, T.; Kunkel, K. E.; Trapp, R. J.; Waliser, D. E.; Wehner, M. F. (2017). "Chapter 9: Extreme Storms". In USGCRP2017 (Report).
• Knutson, T. (2017). "Appendix C: Detection and attribution methodologies overview.". In USGCRP2017 (Report).*Liepert, Beate G.; Previdi, Michael (2009). "Do Models and Observations Disagree on the Rainfall Response to Global Warming?". Journal of Climate. 22 (11): 3156–3166. Bibcode:2009JCli...22.3156L. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2472.1.
• Lindsey, Rebecca (4 September 2018). "Did global warming stop in 1998?". NOAA. Archived from the original on 4 March 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
• Liverman, Diana M. (April 2009). "Conventions of climate change: constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere". Journal of Historical Geography. 35 (2): 279–296. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2008.08.008.
• Liu, Wei; Xie, Shang-Ping; Liu, Zhengyu; Zhu, Jiang (2017). "Overlooked possibility of a collapsed Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in warming climate". Science Advances. 3 (1): e1601666. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E1666L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601666.
• Marshall, Burke; Hsiang, Solomon M.; Edward, Miguel (2014). "Climate and Conflict". NBER. doi:10.3386/w20598. Archived from the original on 18 November 2018.
• McCright, Aaron M.; Dunlap, Riley E. (November 2000). "Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims". Social Problems. 47 (4): 499–522. doi:10.2307/3097132. JSTOR 3097132.
• McGuire, Bill (2010). "Climate forcing of geological and geomorphological hazards". Philosophical Transactions A. 368 (1919): 2311–2315. Bibcode:2010RSPTA.368.2311M. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0077.
• Melillo, J. M.; Frey, S. D.; DeAngelis, K. M.; Werner, W. J.; et al. (2017). "Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world". Science. 358 (6359): 101–105. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..101M. doi:10.1126/science.aan2874. PMID 28983050.
• Mitchum, G. T.; Masters, D.; Hamlington, B. D.; Fasullo, J. T.; et al. (2018). "Climate-change–driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (9): 2022–2025. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.2022N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1717312115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5834701. PMID 29440401.
• Neukom, Raphael; Steiger, Nathan; Gómez-Navarro, Juan José; Wang, Jianghao; et al. (2019). "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era". Nature. 571 (7766): 550–554. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1401-2. ISSN 1476-4687.
• Rahmstorf, Stefan; Cazenave, Anny; Church, John A.; Hansen, James E.; et al. (2007). "Recent Climate Observations Compared to Projections" (PDF). Science. 316 (5825): 709. Bibcode:2007Sci...316..709R. doi:10.1126/science.1136843. PMID 17272686. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 September 2018.
• Siegenthaler, Urs; Stocker, Thomas F.; Monnin, Eric; Lüthi, Dieter; et al. (2005). "Stable Carbon Cycle–Climate Relationship During the Late Pleistocene". Science. 310 (5752): 1313–1317. Bibcode:2005Sci...310.1313S. doi:10.1126/science.1120130. PMID 16311332.
• Sévellec, Florian; Drijfhout, Sybren S. (2018). "A novel probabilistic forecast system predicting anomalously warm 2018–2022 reinforcing the long-term global warming trend". Nature Communications. 9: 3024. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3024S. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05442-8.
• Shindell, Drew; Faluvegi, Greg; Lacis, Andrew; Hansen, James; et al. (2006). "Role of tropospheric ozone increases in 20th-century climate change" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 111 (D8): D08302. Bibcode:2006JGRD..11108302S. doi:10.1029/2005JD006348. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 August 2017.
• Sorenson, Raymond (11 January 2011). "Eunice Foote's Pioneering Research On CO2 And Climate Warming" (PDF). Search and Discovery (70092). Retrieved 31 January 2016.
• Sutton, Rowan T.; Dong, Buwen; Gregory, Jonathan M. (16 January 2007). "Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations". Geophysical Research Letters. 34 (2): L02701. Bibcode:2007GeoRL..3402701S. doi:10.1029/2006GL028164.
•  This article incorporates public domain material from the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) document: NCADAC (11 January 2013). Federal Advisory Committee Draft Climate Assessment. A report by the National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC). Washington, DC. Archived from the original on 13 September 2013. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
• National Research Council (2011). Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts over Decades to Millennia. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12877. ISBN 978-0-309-15176-4. Archived from the original on 27 March 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
• National Research Council (2011). America's Climate Choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12781. ISBN 978-0-309-14585-5. Archived from the original on 21 July 2015. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
• Pinker, R. T.; Zhang, B.; Dutton, E. G. (2005). "Do Satellites Detect Trends in Surface Solar Radiation?". Science. 308 (5723): 850–854. Bibcode:2005Sci...308..850P. doi:10.1126/science.1103159. PMID 15879215.
• Poore, J.; Nemecek, T. (2018). "Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers". Science. 360 (6392): 987–992. Bibcode:2018Sci...360..987P. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216. ISSN 0036-8075.
• Randel, William J.; Shine, Keith P.; Austin, John; Barnett, John; et al. (2009). "An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends". Journal of Geophysical Research. 114 (D2): D02107. Bibcode:2009JGRD..11402107R. doi:10.1029/2008JD010421.
• Ramanathan, V.; Agrawal, M.; Akimoto, H.; Aufhamer, M.; et al. (2008). Report Summary (PDF). Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Regional Assessment Report with Focus on Asia (Report). United Nations Environment Programme. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2011.
• Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. (2008). "Global and Regional Climate Changes due to Black Carbon". Nature Geoscience. 1 (4): 221–227. Bibcode:2008NatGe...1..221R. doi:10.1038/ngeo156.
• Ramanathan, V.; Chung, C.; Kim, D.; Bettge, T.; Buja, L.; Kiehl, J. T.; Washington, W. M.; Fu, Q.; Sikka, D. R.; Wild, M. (2005). "Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (15): 5326–5333. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.5326R. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500656102. PMC 552786. PMID 15749818.
• Ranson, Matthew (2014). "Crime, weather, and climate change". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 67 (3): 274–302. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.008. ISSN 0095-0696.
• Riahi, Keywan; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kriegler, Elmar; Edmonds, Jae; et al. (2017). "The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview". Global Environmental Change. 42: 153–168. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009. ISSN 0959-3780.</ref>
• Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; et al. (2017). "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice". BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125.
• Sand, M.; Berntsen, T. K.; von Salzen, K.; Flanner, M. G.; et al. (2015). "Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers". Nature. 6.
• Schmidt, Gavin A.; Shindell, Drew T.; Tsigaridis, Kostas (March 2014). "Reconciling warming trends". Nature Geoscience. 7 (3): 158–160. Bibcode:2014NatGe...7..158S. doi:10.1038/ngeo2105.
• Sherwood, Steven C.; Huber, Matthew (2010). "An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress". PNAS. 107 (21): 9552–9555. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913352107.
• Smith, Joel B.; Schneider, Stephen H.; Oppenheimer, Michael; Yohe, Gary W.; et al. (17 March 2009). "Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 'reasons for concern'". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (11): 4133–4137. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.4133S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812355106. PMC 2648893. PMID 19251662.
• Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Richardson, Katherine; Lenton, Timothy M.; et al. (2018). "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene". PNAS. 115 (33): 8252–8259. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.8252S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115.
• Stroeve, J.; Holland, Marika M.; Meier, Walt; Scambos, Ted; et al. (2007). "Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast". Geophysical Research Letters. 34 (9): L09501. Bibcode:2007GeoRL..3409501S. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703.
• Stokes, Bruce; Wike, Richard; Carle, Jill (5 November 2015). "Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. Archived from the original on 29 July 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2017.
• Storelvmo, T.; Phillips, P. C. B.; Lohmann, U.; Leirvik, T.; Wild, M. (2016). "Disentangling greenhouse warming and aerosol cooling to reveal Earth's climate sensitivity" (PDF). Nature Geoscience. 9 (4): 286–289. Bibcode:2016NatGe...9..286S. doi:10.1038/ngeo2670. ISSN 1752-0908.
• Sun, Lantao; Perlwitz, Judith; Hoerling, Martin (2016). "What caused the recent "Warm Arctic, Cold Continents" trend pattern in winter temperatures?". Geophysical Research Letters. 43 (10): 5345–5352. doi:10.1002/2016GL069024. ISSN 1944-8007.
• Twomey, S. (1977). "The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds". J. Atmos. Sci. 34 (7): 1149–1152. Bibcode:1977JAtS...34.1149T. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1520-0469.
• Tyndall, John (1861). "On the Absorption and Radiation of Heat by Gases and Vapours, and on the Physical Connection of Radiation, Absorption, and Conduction". Philosophical Magazine. 4. 22: 169–194, 273–285. Archived from the original on 26 March 2016.
• Wolff, Eric W.; Shepherd, John G.; Shuckburgh, Emily; Watson, Andrew J. (2015). "Feedbacks on climate in the Earth system: introduction". Philos Trans A. 373 (2054): 20140428. Bibcode:2015RSPTA.37340428W. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0428. PMC 4608041. PMID 26438277.
• World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC. 2010. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7987-5. ISBN 978-0-8213-7987-5. Archived from the original on 5 March 2010. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
• UNEP (2010). UNEP Emerging Issues: Environmental Consequences of Ocean Acidification: A Threat to Food Security (PDF). Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 April 2015.. news Report summary.
• UNFCCC secretariat (2016). Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs).
•  This article incorporates public domain material from the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) document: USGCRP (2009). Karl, T. R.; Melillo, J.; Peterson, T.; Hassol, S. J. (eds.). Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-14407-0. Archived from the original on 6 April 2010. Retrieved 17 April 2010.. Public-domain status of this report can be found on p. 4 of 102 PDF
• USGCRP (2015). Glossary. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). Archived from the original on 6 May 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.. Archived url.
• USGCRP (2017). Wuebbles, D. J.; Fahey, D. W.; Hibbard, K. A.; Dokken, D. J.; Stewart, B. C.; Maycock, T. K. (eds.). Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I (Report). Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Global Change Research Program.
• US NRC (2008). "Understanding and responding to climate change: Highlights of National Academies Reports, 2008 edition, produced by the US National Research Council (US NRC)". Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
• US NRC (2012). "Climate Change: Evidence, Impacts, and Choices". US National Research Council (US NRC). Archived from the original on 3 May 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2017. Also available as PDF Archived 20 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine
• Weart, Spencer (2013). "Rise of interdisciplinary research on climate". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (Supplement 1): 3657–3664. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107482109.
• Wang, M.; Overland, J. E. (2009). "A sea ice free summer Arctic within 30 years?". Geophysical Research Letters. 36 (7): n/a. Bibcode:2009GeoRL..36.7502W. doi:10.1029/2009GL037820. Archived from the original on 19 January 2012.
• Wang, Hai; Xie, Shang-Ping (2016). "Comparison of Climate Response to Anthropogenic Aerosol versus Greenhouse Gas Forcing: Distinct Patterns". Journal of Climate. 29 (14): 5175–5188. Bibcode:2016JCli...29.5175W. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0106.1.
• Wang, Bin; Shugart, Herman H.; Lerdau, Manuel T. (2017). "Sensitivity of global greenhouse gas budgets to tropospheric ozone pollution mediated by the biosphere". Environmental Research Letters. 12 (8): 084001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa7885. ISSN 1748-9326.
• Watts, Nick; Adger, W Neil; Agnolucci, Paolo; Blackstock, Jason; et al. (November 2015). "Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health". The Lancet. 386 (10006): 1861–1914. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6. hdl:10871/20783. PMID 26111439. Archived from the original on 7 April 2017.
• WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group (28 August 2018). "Global sea-level budget 1993–present". Earth System Science Data. 10 (3): 1551–1590. Bibcode:2018ESSD...10.1551W. doi:10.5194/essd-10-1551-2018. ISSN 1866-3508.
• Wild, M.; Gilgen, Hans; Roesch, Andreas; Ohmura, Atsumu; et al. (2005). "From Dimming to Brightening: Decadal Changes in Solar Radiation at Earth's Surface". Science. 308 (5723): 847–850. Bibcode:2005Sci...308..847W. doi:10.1126/science.1103215. PMID 15879214.
• Wuebbles, D. J.; Easterling, D. R.; Hayhoe, K.; Knutson, T.; Kopp, R. E.; Kossin, J. P.; Kunkel, K. E.; LeGran-de; A. N.; Mears, C.; Sweet, W. V.; Taylor, P. C.; Vose, R. S.; Wehne, M. F. (2017). "Chapter 1: Our Globally Changing Climate" (PDF). In USGCRP2017 (Report).
• Wynes, Seth; Nicholas, Kimberly A (2017). "The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions". Environmental Research Letters. 12 (7): 074024. Bibcode:2017ERL....12g4024W. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541.
• Zhang, Yuan; Goll, Daniel; Bastos, Ana; Balkanski, Yves; et al. (2019). "Increased Global Land Carbon Sink Due to Aerosol‐Induced Cooling". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 33 (3): 439–457. Bibcode:2019GBioC..33..439Z. doi:10.1029/2018GB006051.
• Zeng, Ning; Yoon, Jinho (2009). "Expansion of the world's deserts due to vegetation-albedo feedback under global warming". Geophysical Research Letters. 36 (17): L17401. Bibcode:2009GeoRL..3617401Z. doi:10.1029/2009GL039699. ISSN 1944-8007.
• Zhang, Jinlun; Lindsay, Ron; Steele, Mike; Schweiger, Axel (2008). "What drove the dramatic arctic sea ice retreat during summer 2007?". Geophysical Research Letters. 35: 1–5. Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3511505Z. doi:10.1029/2008gl034005.

Books, reports and legal documents

• DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M. (2007). Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54193-0.
• Fleming, James Rodger (2007). The Callendar Effect: the life and work of Guy Stewart Callendar (1898–1964). Boston: American Meteorological Society. ISBN 978-1-878220-76-9.
• Haywood, Jim (2016). "Chapter 27 - Atmospheric Aerosols and Their Role in Climate Change". In Letcher, Trevor M. (ed.). Climate Change: Observed Impacts on Planet Earth. Elsevier. p. 456. ISBN 9780444635242.
• Meinshausen, Malte (2019). Teske, Sven (ed.). Implications of the Developed Scenarios for Climate Change. Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals: Global and Regional 100% Renewable Energy Scenarios with Non-energy GHG Pathways for +1.5°C and +2°C. Springer International Publishing. pp. 459–469. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2_12. ISBN 9783030058432.
• Morgan, M. Granger; Dowlatabadi, Hadi; Henrion, Max; Keith, David; et al. (2009). "Non-Technical Summary: BOX NT.1 Summary of Climate Change Basics" (PDF). Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2: Best practice approaches for characterizing, communicating, and incorporating scientific uncertainty in decision making. A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, D.C.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 August 2011.
• Müller, Benito (February 2010). Copenhagen 2009: Failure or final wake-up call for our leaders? EV 49 (PDF). Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. p. i. ISBN 978-1-907555-04-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 July 2017. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
• Newell, Peter (14 December 2006). Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse. Cambridge University Press. Bibcode:2001AgFM..109...75B. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00246-5. ISBN 978-0-521-02123-4. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
• NOAA. "January 2017 analysis from NOAA: Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2017. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
• NRC (2008). "Understanding and Responding to Climate Change" (PDF). Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, US National Academy of Sciences. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
• Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik (25 May 2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (first ed.). Bloomsbury Press. ISBN 978-1-59691-610-4.
• PBL Netherlands Environment Agency (15 June 2012). "Figure 6.14, in: Chapter 6: The energy and climate challenge" (PDF). In van Vuuren, D.; Kok, M. (eds.). Roads from Rio+20. ISBN 978-90-78645-98-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 30 May 2013., p. 177, Report no: 500062001. Report website. Archived 1 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine
• Park, Susin (May 2011). "Climate Change and the Risk of Statelessness: The Situation of Low-lying Island States" (PDF). United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 May 2013. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
• UN General Assembly (1992). "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change" (PDF). New York.
• "Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change". Conference of the Parties. 1997.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (2016). Methane and Black Carbon Impacts on the Arctic: Communicating the Science (Report). Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 27 February 2019.
• World Meteorological Organization (2019). WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2018 (Report).

Non-technical sources

ABC

• Sandell, Clayton (3 January 2007). "Report: Big Money Confusing Public on Global Warming". ABC. Archived from the original on 19 February 2007. Retrieved 27 April 2007.

American Institute of Physics

• Weart, S. (February 2015). "The Public and Climate Change (cont. – since 1980). Section: after 1988". The Discovery of Global warming. American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on 11 November 2016. Retrieved 18 August 2015.

BBC

• "Siberian permafrost thaw warning sparked by cave data". BBC. 22 February 2013. Archived from the original on 23 February 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
• Amos, Jonathan (10 May 2013). "Carbon dioxide passes symbolic mark". BBC. Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
• "UK Parliament declares climate change emergency". BBC. 1 May 2019. Retrieved 30 June 2019.

Carbon Brief

• McSweeney, Robert M.; Hausfather, Zeke (15 January 2018). "Q&A: How do climate models work?". Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 5 March 2019. Retrieved 2 March 2019.
• Hausfather, Zeke (19 April 2018). "Explainer: How 'Shared Socioeconomic Pathways' explore future climate change". Carbon Brief. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
• McSweeney, Robert M. (31 January 2019). "Q&A: How is Arctic warming linked to the 'polar vortex' and other extreme weather?".

CNN

• Sutter, John D.; Berlinger, Joshua (12 December 2015). "Final draft of climate deal formally accepted in Paris". CNN. Archived from the original on 12 December 2015. Retrieved 12 December 2015.

The Economist

• "The truth about big oil and climate change". The Economist. 9 February 2019. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
• "A bold new plan to tackle climate change ignores economic orthodoxy". The Economist. London. 7 February 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.

EPA

• US EPA (12 January 2016). "Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data". Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

EUobserver

• "Copenhagen failure 'disappointing', 'shameful'". euobserver.com. 20 December 2009. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

Gallup

• Ray, Julie; Pugliese, Anita (22 April 2011). "Worldwide, Blame for Climate Change Falls on Humans". Gallup.Com. Archived from the original on 4 May 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2011.
• Pugliese, Anita (20 April 2011). "Fewer Americans, Europeans View Global Warming as a Threat". Gallup. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 22 April 2011.

The Guardian

• Adams, David (20 September 2006). "Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 11 February 2014. Retrieved 9 August 2007.
• Nuccitelli, Dana (26 January 2015). "Climate change could impact the poor much more than previously thought". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 December 2016.
• Nuccitelli, Dana (31 August 2015). "Citi report: slowing global warming would save tens of trillions of dollars". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017.
• Vaughan, Adam (12 December 2015). "Paris climate deal: key points at a glance". The Guardian. London and Manchester. Archived from the original on 13 December 2015. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
• Watts, Jonathan (7 August 2018). "Domino-effect of climate events could push Earth into a 'hothouse' state". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 August 2018.
• Taylor, Matthew (27 February 2019). "Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez right to ask if the climate means we should have fewer children?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
• Carrington, Damian (19 March 2019). "School climate strikes: 1.4 million people took part, say campaigners". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
• Milman, Oliver (2 May 2019). "Microsoft joins group seeking to kill off historic climate change lawsuits". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
• Carrington, Damian (17 May 2019). "Why the Guardian is changing the language it uses about the environment". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
• Reuters (18 June 2019). "Scientists shocked by Arctic permafrost thawing 70 years sooner than predicted". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 June 2019.

MSNBC

• "Exxon cuts ties to global warming skeptics". MSNBC. 12 January 2007. Archived from the original on 18 June 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2007.

Met Office

• Booth, Ben (10 October 2016). "Climate feedbacks". Met Office. Retrieved 27 April 2019.

NASA

• "Arctic amplification". NASA. 2013. Archived from the original on 31 July 2018.
• Shaftel, Holly (January 2016). "What's in a name? Weather, global warming and climate change". NASA Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Archived from the original on 28 September 2018. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
• Gray, Ellen (20 August 2018). "Unexpected future boost of methane possible from Arctic permafrost". NASA's Earth Science News Team. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019.
• Carlowicz, Michael (12 September 2018). "Watery heatwave cooks the Gulf of Maine". NASA's Earth Observatory.

National Geographic

• Borunda, Alejandra (15 November 2018). "See how a warmer world primed California for large fires". National Geographic. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
• "Global warming effects". National Geographic. Retrieved 18 May 2019.

National Review

• "Climate Change Will Cause Rape and Murder and Assault and Robbery and Larceny and Make People Steal Your Car". National Review. 27 February 2014. Retrieved 17 November 2018.

Nature

• Schiermeier, Quirin (7 July 2015). "Climate scientists discuss future of their field". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17917. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017.
• Witze, Alexandra (11 July 2016). "Clouds get high on climate change". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20230. Archived from the original on 18 July 2016.

Newsweek

• Begley, Sharon (13 August 2007). "The Truth About Denial". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 21 October 2007. Retrieved 13 August 2007.

NOAA

• "What's the difference between global warming and climate change?". NOAA Climate.gov. 17 June 2015. Archived from the original on 7 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
• "Study: Global plant growth surging alongside carbon dioxide". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 20 April 2017. Archived from the original on 2 March 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2019.

NPR

• Joyce, Christopher (15 February 2010). "Get This: Warming Planet Can Mean More Snow". NPR. Archived from the original on 21 March 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2018.

OpenDemocracy

• "Copenhagen: a successful failure". openDemocracy. 12 January 2010. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.

Pew Research

• "Climate Change and Financial Instability Seen as Top Global Threats". Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. 24 June 2013. Archived from the original on 4 October 2013.

Phys.org

• Sheridan, Kerry (6 August 2018). "Earth risks tipping into 'hothouse' state: study". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019.
• Poortinga, Wouter; Fisher, Stephen; Böhm, Gisela; Steg, Linda; Whitmarsh, Lorraine; Ogunbode, Charles (September 2018). "European Attitudes to Climate Change and Energy" (PDF). Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2018 (9).

Popular Mechanics

• Molina, Francis (March 1912). "Remarkable Weather of 1911: The Effect of Combustion of Coal on Climate – What Scientists Predict for the Future". Popular Mechanics. pp. 339–342. Retrieved 13 October 2018.

RIVM

• Documentary Sea Blind (Dutch Television) (in Dutch). RIVM: Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. 11 October 2016. Archived from the original on 17 August 2018. Retrieved 26 February 2019.

Science

• Perkins, Sid (11 July 2017). "The best way to reduce your carbon footprint is one the government isn't telling you about". Science. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.

ScienceDaily

• "Shutdown Of Circulation Pattern Could Be Disastrous, Researchers Say". ScienceDaily. 20 December 2004. Archived from the original on 13 January 2005.
• "Carbon dioxide is 'driving fish crazy'". ScienceDaily. 21 January 2012. Archived from the original on 30 July 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
• "Climate change linked to potential population decline in bees". ScienceDaily. 28 June 2018. Archived from the original on 30 July 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2018.

Scientific American

• Ogburn, Stephanie Paige (29 April 2014). "Indian Monsoons Are Becoming More Extreme". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 22 June 2018.
• Sneed, Annie (23 January 2018). "Ask the Experts: Does Rising CO₂ Benefit Plants?". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2019.

The Braidwood Dispatch and Mining Journal

• "Coal Consumption Affecting Climate". The Braidwood Dispatch and Mining Journal (New South Wales). 17 July 1912. p. 4. Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.

The New York Times

• Rudd, Kevin (25 May 2015). "Paris Can't Be Another Copenhagen". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 February 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
• Fandos, Nicholas (29 April 2017). "Climate March Draws Thousands of Protesters Alarmed by Trump's Environmental Agenda". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
• Davenport, Carol (7 October 2018). "Major Climate Report Describes a Strong Risk of Crisis as Early as 2040". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 October 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2018.

The Washington Post

• Mooney, Chris (22 October 2014). "There's a surprisingly strong link between climate change and violence". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 12 May 2015.
• Mooney, Chris (2018). "The next five years will be 'anomalously warm,' scientists predict". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 14 August 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2018.
• Kaplan, Sarah (2018). "Climate change could render many of Earth's ecosystems unrecognizable". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 30 August 2018. Retrieved 30 August 2018.

U.S. Geological Survey

• Perlman, Howard (18 June 2018). "Ice, Snow, and Glaciers: The Water Cycle". U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2019.

USA Today

• "Global warming risk: Rising temperatures from climate change linked to rise in suicides". USA Today. 13 July 2018. Archived from the original on 30 July 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2018.

Vice

• Segalov, Michael (2 May 2019). "The UK Has Declared a Climate Emergency: What Now?". Vice. Retrieved 30 June 2019.

Vox

• "The best way to reduce your personal carbon emissions: don't be rich". Vox. 15 October 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2019.

Yale Climate Connections

• Peach, Sara (2 November 2010). "Yale Researcher Anthony Leiserowitz On Studying, Communicating with American Public". Yale Climate Connections. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2018.

External links

Library resources about Global warming

Resources in your library Resources in other libraries

Research

• NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies – Global change research
• Climate Change at the National Academies – repository for reports
• Met Office: Climate Guide – UK National Weather Service
• Educational Global Climate Modelling (EdGCM) – research-quality climate change simulator

Educational

• NASA: Climate change: How do we know?
• Global Climate Change Indicators – NOAA
• Skeptical Science: Getting skeptical about global warming skepticism
• Climate change tutorial by Prof. Myles Allen (Oxford), March 2018: Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (45 min. total); background & slide deck