Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This WikiProject is under the scope of WikiProject Canada.

WikiProject Montreal


Flag of Montreal.svg

This WikiProject is an attempt to organize articles about Montreal and the Greater Montreal Area into a coherent format.

Introduction[edit]

Flags of Montreal, Quebec and Canada in front of Montreal City Hall.

This WikiProject is a collaboration that aims to organize, expand, improve the quality, and provide accurate information in an established, community-drive, Wikipedia standard for the city of Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and its related articles.

We need your help! If you are a resident, expert, or have some knowledge about the province or a related article, YOU can:

Scope[edit]

  1. Improve the quality of Montreal-related articles.
  2. Expand the number of articles related to Montreal and the Greater Montreal Area in Wikipedia
Featured article FA A-Class article A  GA B-Class article B C-Class article C Start-Class article Start Stub-Class article Stub Featured list FL  List Future-Class article Future Wikipedia Book Book Category page Category Disambiguation page Disambig  Draft  File  Portal  Project Redirect page Redirect  Template  NA  ??? Total
9027763042,1881,3363791040525820011180165064,843
WikiProject Montreal  articles by quality     Refresh

Parentage[edit]

The parent of this WikiProject is WikiProject Quebec, WikiProject Canada, WikiProject Canadian communities and WikiProject Cities.

Similar Wikiprojects[edit]

WikiProject Canada WP Canada Logo-.svg


African cities
Lagos
Asian cities and city-states (non-Indian)
Dubai, Hong Kong, Macau, Shenzhen, Singapore
Australian cities
Adelaide, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney
Canadian cities
Montreal, Ottawa, St. John's, Toronto, Vancouver
European cities and regions
Bedfordshire, Belfast, Belgrade, Brighton, Bristol, Cardiff, Cheshire, Cornwall, Devon, Frankfurt, Greater Manchester, Hertfordshire, Kent, London, Munich, North East England, Porto, Rome, Sheffield, Somerset, Surrey, Sussex (West and East), Vienna, West Midlands, Zagreb
Indian cities
Balasore, Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Cuttack, Delhi, Eluru, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mangalore, Mumbai, Patna, Visakhapatnam
Mexican cities
Tijuana
New Zealand cities
Auckland
US cities and regions
See also: List of U.S. WikiProjects
Appalachia, Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Cape Cod and the Islands, Capital District (Albany, NY and vicinity), Charlotte, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbia (MO), Dallas-Fort Worth, Erie, Houston, Hudson Valley, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Kansas City, KYOVA Region (KY, OH, WV), Las Vegas, Lehigh Valley (PA, NJ), Los Angeles, Louisville, Lowell, Miami, Myrtle Beach, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Francisco Bay Area, San Diego, Santa Barbara County (CA), Seattle, Shreveport, Southern California, Syracuse, Tampa Bay Area, Washington, D.C., Western New York State, Youngstown

Participants[edit]

To join WikiProject Montreal, edit this section and add #{{User|yourusername}} and any comments to the bottom of the following list of members.

  1. MTLskyline (talk · contribs), South Shore
  2. Robin Hood 1212 (talk · contribs), Montreal
  3. Skeezix1000 (talk · contribs), I would rather not say
  4. Mtlfiredude (talk · contribs), Mount Royal
  5. Shawn in Montreal (talk · contribs), Plateau/Mile End
  6. M3taphysical (talk · contribs), Outremont
  7. Basser_g (talk · contribs), Saint-Henri, Old Montreal
  8. Jeangagnon (talk · contribs), Montreal
  9. Gordalmighty (talk · contribs), Quebec in general
  10. Peter Horn (talk · contribs), Montreal, Laval, Quebec in general
  11. Blanchardb (talk · contribs), Somewhere in the off-island suburbs.
  12. Isnobody (talk · contribs), NDG
  13. Freshacconci (talk · contribs), Le Sud-Ouest
  14. Charlesquebec (talk · contribs), Sports
  15. Mars2mogwai (talk · contribs), Montreal
  16. Vieux supporteur de hockey féminin (talk · contribs), hockey féminin, les arénas dans les quartiers et peut être l'architecture des églises catholiques (je suis un ancien curé défroqué)
  17. Cornellier (talk · contribs), Pointe-Claire
  18. Jeanpetr (talk · contribs), Centre-Ville
  19. Viola-ness (talk · contribs), "Plateau, Montreal"
  20. Bob_A_La_Max (talk · contribs),Laval,Montreal
  21. jefferythomas (talk · contribs), "NDG"
  22. Callmemirela (talk · contribs), Westmount/NDG
  23. julientm (talk · contribs), "Montreal Island"
  24. Letsgetphysical5678 (talk · contribs), "West Island"
  25. Moonraker (talk · contribs)
  26. Anna.haywood (talk · contribs) "Outremont"
  27. StevenBjerke97 (talk · contribs) Centre-Sud/Hochelaga
  28. Ccwonders (talk · contribs) "Montreal"

Member userbox[edit]

You may place {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal/Userbox}} on your user page to display the following userbox:

Flag of Montreal.svgThis user is a member of
WikiProject Montreal.

This template will add your user page to:

Templates[edit]

Stubs[edit]

Montreal-related articles may have one or more of the following stubs applied to them, as needed, in addition to, or in lieu of, Canada-specific stubs:

Talk page banner[edit]

WikiProject Montreal (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This article has been rated as Project-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
Or
WikiProject Canada / Montreal (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This article has been rated as Project-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
 This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal.
 

Portal[edit]

  • {{portal|Canada}}...To be placed in the "see also" section of Montreal related articles if appropriate

Navboxes[edit]

To be placed at the "bottom" of related articles.

Volunteer recognition[edit]

  • The Canadian Content Award
     This is for outstanding contributions to Canadian related pages on Wikipedia.
A Barnstar!
The Silver Maple Leaf Award
Award for editors that contribute to Canada related projects and topics.

Userbox[edit]

  • The userbox for the project is {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Montreal/Userbox}}
Flag of Montreal.svgThis user is a member of
WikiProject Montreal.

Assessment instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Montreal}} or {{WikiProject Canada}} project banner: Place this on the talk page of the article

{{WikiProject Montreal| ... | class=??? |importance=??? ...}}

or

{{WikiProject Canada|qc=yes|montreal=yes|class=???|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for importance:

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
Featured article FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead or lede: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
Featured list FL  The article has attained featured list status.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
A-Class article A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA  The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:

A good article is:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)
B-Class article B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Human
(as of April 2019)
C-Class article C  The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
Start-Class article Start  An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ring-tailed cardinalfish
(as of June 2018)
Stub-Class article Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
 Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Crescent Falls
(as of June 2018)
 List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947
(as of June 2018)


Montreal articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
Featured article FA 2 2 5 9
Featured list FL 1 1 1 3
GA 3 1 13 10 27
B 11 33 32 76
C 3 26 103 168 4 304
Start 2 57 586 1,520 3 20 2,188
Stub 5 157 1,157 2 13 1,334
List 6 19 49 3 2 79
Future 1 1
Category 2 403 405
Disambig 25 25
File 20 20
Project 11 11
Redirect 180 180
Template 2 163 165
Other 2 6 8
Assessed 8 113 914 2,944 816 40 4,835
Unassessed 1 5 6
Total 8 113 914 2,945 816 45 4,841
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 20,454 Ω = 5.19


See also[edit]

Portals

Categories

Users


Tools[edit]

Main tool page: toolserver.org
  • Reflinks - Edits bare references — adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.

External watchlist[edit]


This project is part of WikiProject Canada. Click here for more information.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Montreal&oldid=1007032671"