Template talk:Islamophobia

Deletion discussion

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 19#Template:Islamophobia - result: no consensus.

Stigmatizing labeling of media sites via template

This template is now is being misused to label certain web sites with the stigmatizing term of "islamophobia". I believe this hurts the credibility of Wikipedia and use of the unclear term of "islamophobia" should not be promoted by Wikipedia itself. The word can be misused by certain groups to label opponents performing legitimate criticism of islam. Now certain users can add any website to this stigmatizing template without discussion. User:Newslinger readded Document.no to this template, a small Norwegian conservative website, and added Breitbart too for good measure, without discussion or citing credible sources. --Bjarkan (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

As I stated on Talk:Document.no, the consensus of high-quality academic sources is that Document.no is an "Islamophobic" or "anti-Muslim" website. Sources below (emphasis added):

In Norway, strongly anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant voices increasingly began to make themselves heard, and they would soon enter the mainstream media. The most influential website devoted to anti-Muslim discourse, document.no, later infamous for being the terrorist Anders Behring Breivik's favorite website, was founded in January 2003.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland (18 November 2016). "Social Anthropology and the Shifting Discourses about Immigrants in Norway". Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavia. Springer International. p. 105. ISBN 978-3-319-40484-4. Retrieved 22 October 2020 – via Google Books.

The day after the attacks, Hans Rustad—editor of the Norwegian anti-Muslim forum document.no where Breivik had been a frequent participant—revealed that "large parts" of 2083 were plagiarized from the Unabomber Manifesto, published in 1995 by anti-modernist and technology critic Ted Kaczynski, who carried out a series of 16 bomb attacks against universities and airline companies. [...] Is the claim correct? Well, not really. Three of 1516 pages are taken from the Unabomber Manifesto, from a section in which Kaczynski decries the left (substituted for multiculturalists by Breivik). The remaining 1513 pages come from elsewhere.

Gardell, Mattias (January 2014). "Crusader Dreams: Oslo 22/7, Islamophobia, and the Quest for a Monocultural Europe" (PDF). Terrorism and Political Violence. Taylor & Francis. 26 (1): 132. doi:10.1080/09546553.2014.849930. Retrieved 22 October 2020.

The most active among the more established anti-Muslim organisations are Stop Islamisation of Norway, Human Rights Service and Document.no.

Døving, Cora Alexa (20 February 2020). ""Muslims Are..."". In Hoffmann, Christhard; Moe, Vibeke (eds.). The Shifting Boundaries of Prejudice: Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in Contemporary Norway. Scandinavian University Press. doi:10.18261/978-82-15-03468-3-2019-09.

Øyvind Strømmen argues in his book, Det Mørke Nettet, that it is essential to understand the dangerous undercurrents of counter-jihad movements that flourish on the Internet. It was these chat forums and specialised sites, like 'Gates of Vienna' and Document.no, which steadily nourished Breivik with a constant stream of anti-immigrant, Islamophobic and xenophobic arguments and which provided a ready-tailored and adapted counter-jihad ideological framework.

Ranstorp, Magnus (2013). "'Lone Wolf Terrorism'. The Case of Anders Breivik". Sicherheit und Frieden. Nomos. 31 (2): 89. ISSN 0175-274X. JSTOR 24234145.

Unless you have comparable sources of similar quality that claim that Document.no is not Islamophobic, Document.no belongs in this template. — Newslinger talk 20:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)