Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment
- Attention needed
- New articles
- Articles up for deletion
- Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- Requests for comment
- Suspected policy breaches
- Discretionary Sanctions apply to biographies
- Assessment
- Core biographies
- Maintenance
- Peer reviews
- Arts and entertainment
- Living persons
- Military
- Orphaned articles
- Politics and government
- Royalty and nobility
- Science and academia
- Sports and games
- Assess an article
This list is generated automatically on alternate nights.
view full worklist
Biography articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | Other | Total | |||||
FA | 28 | 1,201 | 1,229 | ||||
FL | 154 | 154 | |||||
A | 98 | 98 | |||||
GA | 38 | 4,538 | 4,576 | ||||
B | 73 | 19,276 | 19,349 | ||||
C | 62 | 45,139 | 45,201 | ||||
Start | 2 | 389,961 | 389,963 | ||||
Stub | 1 | 777,233 | 777,234 | ||||
List | 3,478 | 3,478 | |||||
Book | 754 | 754 | |||||
Category | 15,981 | 15,981 | |||||
Disambig | 6,500 | 6,500 | |||||
File | 322 | 322 | |||||
Redirect | 6,751 | 6,751 | |||||
Template | 1,232 | 1,232 | |||||
NA | 58 | 58 | |||||
Assessed | 204 | 1,272,676 | 1,272,880 | ||||
Unassessed | 116,122 | 116,122 | |||||
Total | 204 | 1,388,798 | 1,389,002 | ||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = | 6,296,428Ω = 5.56 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Biography WikiProject. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Biography articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
Category:Biography articles by quality serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Biography articles by quality.
Contents
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I get an article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Biography WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
- How may I begin assessing articles?
- Assessment may be done through a variety of ways, but the most efficient is through use of the MetaData article assessment script.
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions on how to assess a Biography article[edit]
An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles. At present, there are over 100,000 biography articles that need assessment (e.g., that need to have a class inserted in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template).
Biography articles to be assessed have some aspects of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template on their talk page, but the template may be incomplete. Select an article from the list at Category:Unassessed biography articles. Then, look over the article in anticipation of filling out the parameters of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template. Finally, add in the proper parameters to the talk page template, as outlined below.
Class parameter[edit]
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class biography articles)
- FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class biography articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class biography articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class biography articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class biography articles)
- C (adds articles to Category:C-Class biography articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class biography articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class biography articles)
- List (adds articles to Category:List-Class biography articles)
- NA (for pages, such as redirects, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class biography articles)
- Dab (a more specific categorization than NA, for use on disambiguation pages)
- Template (a more specific categorization than NA, for use on template pages; see example)
- Cat (a more specific categorization than NA, for use on category pages)
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
Priority parameter[edit]
The following values may be used for the priority parameter:
- Top
- High
- Mid
- Low
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the priority scale below. Note that the priority is used on the workgroup lists only.
Core parameter[edit]
The template also has a core=yes parameter for core articles only, as selected by the Core Biographies team.
Quality scale[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Mary Shelley (as of June 2008) |
||
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. Peer review may help. | Milla Jovovich (as of June 2008) |
||
GA | The article has attained good article status by passing an official review.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Theodore Kaczynski (as of July 2008) |
||
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Captain Beefheart (as of July 2008) |
||
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Mark Gerban (as of December 2011) |
||
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Samuel Beardsley (as of May 2008) |
||
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Urraca of Castile, Queen of Portugal (as of May 2014) |
||
FL | The article has attained featured list status.
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | Timeline of Jane Austen (as of March 2008) |
||
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of mycologists (as of June 2008) |
Priority scale[edit]
Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If priority values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the biography falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).
Label | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | High probability that non-Historians would look this up. Limited to the top 200 biographies. Must have had a large impact outside of their main discipline, across several generations, and in the majority of the world. For instance, Einstein, brilliant physicist, but his theories have affected people outside of physics and in many other countries besides his nation of origin and several generations. His ideas have changed the way people think. No member should give this rating to any biography without first getting Project approval from the other members. | Albert Einstein |
High | Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. | Patrick Henry |
Mid | Important in their discipline. | John Seigenthaler, Sr. |
Low | Subject is notable in their main discipline. | Morena Baccarin |
08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for an article, please feel free to list it below.
Note: This is only to rate the article on quality - you will probably not get feedback on the article.
If you desire comments please use the peer review process.
If you assess an article, please remove it so others will not waste time reviewing the same article(s).
It is also helpful to leave a brief note on article's talk, under a heading "B-class review", stating why the article was failed (or that it was reviewed and passed).
Make sure to check the overview on how to assess a Biography article for details on how to assess. Thanks!
Articles submitted here will not be rated above 'B'; see Wikipedia:Good articles and Wikipedia:Featured articles for higher assessments.
Edit this section and place request here:
- Niguma - AD64 (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hiep Thi Le - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Zoë Tamerlis Lund - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Franklyn Seales - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ruth Attaway - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Paula Murad Coburn - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sayed Bozorg Mahmoody - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Gregory Powell (murderer) - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Maynard Eziashi - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Steve Gordon (director) - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Peter Segal - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Tom Towles - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Rawle D. Lewis - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Jessica Lundy - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Robert Fields - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bill Morey - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nicholas St. John (screenwriter) - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Mikhail Markhasev (murderer) - I am the creator of this article - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 04:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Joseph Kosala - I am the creator of this article - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 03:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Frank Napier - I am the creator of this article - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Virgil Lee Griffin - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nicholas Ingram - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Alton Wayne Roberts - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 02:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Jimmy Snowden - Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 02:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Robert M. Citino - K.e.coffman (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Statistics[edit]
Current status[edit]
Biography articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | Other | Total | |||||
FA | 28 | 1,201 | 1,229 | ||||
FL | 154 | 154 | |||||
A | 98 | 98 | |||||
GA | 38 | 4,538 | 4,576 | ||||
B | 73 | 19,276 | 19,349 | ||||
C | 62 | 45,139 | 45,201 | ||||
Start | 2 | 389,961 | 389,963 | ||||
Stub | 1 | 777,233 | 777,234 | ||||
List | 3,478 | 3,478 | |||||
Book | 754 | 754 | |||||
Category | 15,981 | 15,981 | |||||
Disambig | 6,500 | 6,500 | |||||
File | 322 | 322 | |||||
Redirect | 6,751 | 6,751 | |||||
Template | 1,232 | 1,232 | |||||
NA | 58 | 58 | |||||
Assessed | 204 | 1,272,676 | 1,272,880 | ||||
Unassessed | 116,122 | 116,122 | |||||
Total | 204 | 1,388,798 | 1,389,002 | ||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = | 6,296,428Ω = 5.56 |
Historical counts[edit]
July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | 34 | 3.80 % | 106 | 0.08 % | 185 | 0.11 % | 193 | 0.11 % | 212 | 0.11 % | 222 | 0.11 % | ||
A | 9 | 1.01 % | 57 | 0.04 % | 77 | 0.05 % | 95 | 0.05 % | 95 | 0.05 % | 104 | 0.05 % | ||
GA | 34 | 3.80 % | 137 | 0.10 % | 195 | 0.12 % | 195 | 0.11 % | 243 | 0.13 % | 266 | 0.14 % | ||
B | 220 | 24.61 % | 1,383 | 1.05 % | 1,967 | 1.21 % | 2,360 | 1.32 % | 2,682 | 1.44 % | 3,060 | 1.58 % | ||
Start | 104 | 11.63 % | 4,107 | 3.13 % | 5,634 | 3.47 % | 6,621 | 3.71 % | 7,980 | 4.30 % | 34,554 | 9.37 % | ||
Stub | 67 | 7.49 % | 3,515 | 2.68 % | 27,816 | 17.12 % | 41,572 | 23.27 % | 43,715 | 23.59 % | 46,635 | 24.15 % | ||
Assessed | 468 | 52.35 % | 9,305 | 7.10 % | 35,874 | 22.08 % | 51,036 | 28.56 % | 54,927 | 29.65 % | 59,904 | 31.03 % | ||
Unassessed | 426 | 47.65 % | 121,800 | 92.90 % | 126,581 | 77.92 % | 127,644 | 71.44 % | 130,325 | 70.35 % | 133,177 | 68.98 % | ||
Total | 894 | 131,105 | 162,455 | 178,680 | 185,252 | 193,081 | ||||||||
January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | |||||||||||
FA | 238 | 0.11 % | 248 | 0.12 % | 270 | 0.10 % | 286 | 0.08 % | 300 | 0.08 % | 317 | 0.08 % | ||
A | 105 | 0.05 % | 111 | 0.05 % | 109 | 0.04 % | 61 | 0.02 % | 51 | 0.01 % | 62 | 0.02 % | ||
GA | 297 | 0.14 % | 344 | 0.16 % | 358 | 0.13 % | 391 | 0.11 % | 415 | 0.11 % | 451 | 0.11 % | ||
B | 3,583 | 1.79 % | 4,553 | 2.15 % | 6,699 | 2.52 % | 7,420 | 2.01 % | 7,903 | 2.08 % | 9,941 | 2.52 % | ||
Start | 9,617 | 4.98 % | 12,049 | 6.02 % | 16,774 | 7.92 % | 29,405 | 11.05 % | 38,107 | 10.04 % | 60,286 | 15.44 % | ||
Stub | 49,852 | 24.91 % | 62,198 | 29.36 % | 85,677 | 32.02 % | 207,699 | 56.33 % | 219,635 | 57.87 % | 240,797 | 61.14 % | ||
Assessed | 66,124 | 33.05 % | 84,228 | 39.76 % | 122,518 | 46.05 % | 250,411 | 67.91 % | 266,411 | 70.19 % | 311,854 | 79.18 % | ||
Unassessed | 133,957 | 66.95 % | 127,639 | 60.25 % | 143,547 | 53.95 % | 118,311 | 32.09 % | 113,126 | 29.81 % | 81,996 | 20.82 % | ||
Total | 200,081 | 211,867 | 266,065 | 368,722 | 379,537 | 393,850 | ||||||||
July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | |||||||||
FA | 325 | 0.08 % | 338 | 0.08 % | 360 | 0.08 % | 368 | 0.08 % | 389 | 0.09 % | 409 | 0.09 % | ||
A | 73 | 0.02 % | 67 | 0.02 % | 72 | 0.02 % | 73 | 0.02 % | 74 | 0.02 % | 22 | 0.005 % | ||
GA | 508 | 0.12 % | 547 | 0.13 % | 578 | 0.13 % | 606 | 0.14 % | 638 | 0.14 % | 705 | 0.15 % | ||
B | 11,345 | 2.77 % | 12,551 | 2.98 % | 13,017 | 2.95 % | 13,156 | 2.95 % | 13,323 | 2.95 % | 13,493 | 2.92 % | ||
Start | 72,224 | 17.61 % | 81,464 | 19.33 % | 88,191 | 19.98 % | 89,645 | 20.13 % | 91,489 | 20.27 % | 92,968 | 20.14 % | ||
Stub | 251,820 | 61.41 % | 263,069 | 62.41 % | 284,594 | 64.46 % | 285,629 | 64.15 % | 288,878 | 64.01 % | 296,518 | 64.22 % | ||
List | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 79 | 0.02 % | 75 | 0.02 % | ||||||
Assessed | 336,295 | 82.01 % | 358,036 | 84.94 % | 386,812 | 87.62 % | 389,477 | 87.48 % | 394,870 | 87.50 % | 404,190 | 87.54 % | ||
Unassessed | 73,770 | 17.99 % | 63,456 | 15.06 % | 54,677 | 12.38 % | 55,744 | 12.52 % | 56,426 | 12.50 % | 57,506 | 12.46 % | ||
Total | 410,065 | 421,492 | 441,489 | 445,221 | 451,296 | 461,696 | ||||||||
January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | |||||||||
FA | 428 | 0.09 % | 441 | 0.09 % | 467 | 0.09 % | 484 | 0.09 % | 499 | 0.10 % | 515 | 0.10 % | ||
A | 19 | 0.004 % | 19 | 0.004 % | 20 | 0.004 % | 22 | 0.004 % | 20 | 0.004 % | 22 | 0.004 % | ||
GA | 757 | 0.15 % | 784 | 0.16 % | 878 | 0.17 % | 934 | 0.18 % | 983 | 0.19 % | 984 | 0.19 % | ||
B | 13,629 | 2.74 % | 13,698 | 2.74 % | 14,023 | 2.78 % | 14,160 | 2.78 % | 14,460 | 2.80 % | 14,594 | 2.79 % | ||
C | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 119 | 0.02 % | |||||||
Start | 94,615 | 19.03 % | 95,799 | 19.20 % | 100,651 | 19.92 % | 103,688 | 20.34 % | 109,457 | 21.19 % | 112,541 | 21.51 % | ||
Stub | 308,861 | 62.11 % | 311,161 | 62.35 % | 318,234 | 62.99 % | 323,539 | 63.47 % | 333,698 | 64.59 % | 340,940 | 65.16 % | ||
List | 93 | 0.02 % | 92 | 0.02 % | 106 | 0.02 % | 108 | 0.02 % | 109 | 0.02 % | 114 | 0.02 % | ||
Assessed | 418,402 | 84.13 % | 421,994 | 84.56 % | 434,379 | 85.98 % | 442,935 | 86.90 % | 459,226 | 88.89 % | 469,829 | 89.80 % | ||
Unassessed | 78,898 | 15.87 % | 77,071 | 15.44 % | 70,843 | 14.02 % | 66,799 | 13.10 % | 57,410 | 11.11 % | 53,385 | 10.20 % | ||
Total | 497,300 | 499,065 | 505,222 | 509,734 | 516,636 | 523,214 |
Monthly changes[edit]
August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | +72 | +211.76 % | +79 | +74.53 % | +8 | +4.32 % | +19 | +9.84 % | +10 | +4.72 % | ||
A | +48 | +533.33 % | +20 | +35.09 % | +18 | +23.38 % | +0 | +0.00 % | +9 | +9.47 % | ||
GA | +103 | +302.94 % | +58 | +42.34 % | +0 | +0.00 % | +48 | +24.62 % | +23 | +9.47 % | ||
B | +1,163 | +528.64 % | +584 | +42.23 % | +393 | +19.98 % | +322 | +13.64 % | +378 | +14.09 % | ||
Start | +4,003 | +3,849.04 % | +1,527 | +37.18 % | +987 | +17.52 % | +1,359 | +20.53 % | +1,637 | +20.51 % | ||
Stub | +3,448 | +5,146.27 % | +24,301 | +691.35 % | +13,756 | +49.45 % | +2,143 | +5.15 % | +2,920 | +6.68 % | ||
Assessed | +8,837 | +1,888.25 % | +26,569 | +285.53 % | +15,162 | +42.26 % | +3,891 | +7.62 % | +4,977 | +9.06 % | ||
Unassessed | +121,374 | +28,491.55 % | +4,781 | +3.93 % | +1,063 | +0.84 % | +2,681 | +2.10 % | +2,852 | +2.19 % | ||
Total | +130,211 | +14,564.99 % | +31,350 | +23.91 % | +16,225 | +9.99 % | +6,572 | +3.68 % | +7,829 | +4.23 % | ||
January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | |||||||||
FA | +16 | +6.72 % | +10 | +4.20 % | +22 | +8.87 % | +16 | +5.93 % | +14 | +4.90 % | ||
A | +1 | +0.96 % | +6 | +5.71 % | -2 | -1.80 % | -48 | -44.04 % | -10 | -16.39 % | ||
GA | +31 | +11.65 % | +47 | +15.83 % | +14 | +4.07 % | +33 | +9.22 % | +24 | +6.14 % | ||
B | +523 | +17.09 % | +970 | +27.07 % | +2,146 | +47.13 % | +721 | +10.76 % | +483 | +6.51 % | ||
Start | +2,432 | +25.29 % | +4,725 | +39.22 % | +12,631 | +75.30 % | +5,149 | +17.51 % | +8,702 | +29.59 % | ||
Stub | +3,217 | +6.90 % | +12,346 | +24.77 % | +23,479 | +37.75 % | +122,022 | +142.42 % | +11,936 | +5.75 % | ||
Assessed | +6,220 | +10.38 % | +18,104 | +27.28 % | +38,290 | +45.46 % | +127,893 | +104.39 % | +16,000 | +6.39 % | ||
Unassessed | +780 | +0.58 % | -6,318 | -4.72 % | +15,908 | +12.46 % | -25,236 | -17.58 % | -5,185 | -4.38 % | ||
Total | +7,000 | +3.63 % | +11,786 | +5.89 % | +54,198 | +25.58 % | +102,657 | +38.58 % | +10,815 | +2.93 % | ||
June 2007 | ||||||||||||
FA | +17 | +5.67 % | ||||||||||
A | +11 | +21.57 % | ||||||||||
GA | +36 | +8.67 % | ||||||||||
B | +2,038 | +25.79 % | ||||||||||
Start | +22,179 | +58.20 % | ||||||||||
Stub | +21,162 | +9.64 % | ||||||||||
Assessed | +45,443 | +17.06 % | ||||||||||
Unassessed | -31,130 | -27.52 % | ||||||||||
Total | +14,313 | +3.77 % |
Assessment log[edit]
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Biography articles by quality log
Worklist[edit]
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |