Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Here is a question I had posed at WP:IPNA/Nish that I'm cross-posting here. As topics associated with Indigenous Peoples of the Americas are in need of better attention, IPNA proposes to restructure, bring about a macroproject to cover all of the Americas, create a new Indigenous Peoples of South America project, and have 6 regional subprojects or categories for both, with 2 multi-regional subproject/categories for the reorganized IPNA. The current proposal is to have IPNA/Nish to include all Cree peoples, and then this combined multi-regional subproject, together with a parallel multi-regional subproject covering all the various Dene peoples. Would we here at IPNA/Nish mind broadening of the scope to include all the Cree as well so that we have a set of dedicated group of people who would work on both Cree-related and Anishinaabe-related articles? Please go to WP:IPNA and comment on the project restructuring. Miigwech. CJLippert (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Where was gotten info about total population Cree people in Canada? What sources?--Kaiyr (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Source or verification for the list of Cree Communities?[edit]
This is not intended in a harshly critical way, but... Going through Canadian gov't sources, it is not easy to distinguish Cree reservations from non-Cree, and many First Nations comprise both Cree and non-Cree groups in the same political unit. I notice some other problems that raise an eyebrow... e.g., a broken link for Mosquito-Grizzly Bear's Head-Lean Man that just names the F.N. as "Mosquito Grizzly Bear's Head First Nation" (thus excluding one of the bands, intentionally or accidentally?). Does anyone know what published source this list derives from, or, better still, a published source that this could be compared to (either for verification or improvement)?71.17.90.240 (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment if this is moved, then the disambiguation page should replace it at the base location -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 05:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose No rational given. 117Avenue (talk) 05:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose as per 117Avenue. Also the past couple of years discussions on this type of article have gone with the people being at an undisambiguated title where the people are the primary target. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
like English, French, Spanish for example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.164.90 (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Just checked and of that list there are about six of them that are still at the "Foo people" title. The rest have been moved to the undisabiguated "Foo". CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
'Strong oppose per 117 Avenue and Cambridge Bay Weather and also per WP:DEADHORSE, adding unneeded disambiguation to unique names with a clear PRIMARYTOPIC has been proven/demonstrated to be against guidelines and policy (TITLE per the Five Characteristics) and more. There is no grounds for this move in guidelines, or in reality either.Skookum1 (talk) 09:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
